If the right to bear arms is an absolute, unalienable right conferred by our Creator, then how is he wrong? It is either a right, or it is not. There is nothing in between.
The 2nd A is not for us, it is meant to put government on notice that they have 0 power / authority over the right to bear arms.
There is no degree of right or wrong, it is either 100%, or it is 0.
If the right to bear arms is an absolute, unalienable right conferred by our Creator, then how is he wrong? It is either a right, or it is not. There is nothing in between.
The 2nd A is not for us, it is meant to put government on notice that they have 0 power / authority over the right to bear arms.
There is no degree of right or wrong, it is either 100%, or it is 0.