Military occupation would bankrupt mainland USA in two weeks. EUs combined army (excluding UK) is stronger than the US army, but the US have the shorter distance to it's advantage. Nobody would win a military occupation. EU would let the US take the island without resistance then implement sanctions, hence two weeks until the US runs out of supplies and all hell breaks lose.
And while the US is weak from lack of supplies, civil war and more land than it can defend. China and Russia will take the opportunity to make their moves.
On the plus side, muh greatest ally will lose to the Arabs as the US lose it's overseas military bases. Hence no "greater israel". Middle east would stabilize and muslims living in the west would return home.
Military occupation would fix that...
Military occupation would bankrupt mainland USA in two weeks. EUs combined army (excluding UK) is stronger than the US army, but the US have the shorter distance to it's advantage. Nobody would win a military occupation. EU would let the US take the island without resistance then implement sanctions, hence two weeks until the US runs out of supplies and all hell breaks lose.
And while the US is weak from lack of supplies, civil war and more land than it can defend. China and Russia will take the opportunity to make their moves.
On the plus side, muh greatest ally will lose to the Arabs as the US lose it's overseas military bases. Hence no "greater israel". Middle east would stabilize and muslims living in the west would return home.
"Military occupation would bankrupt mainland USA in two weeks. EUs combined army (excluding UK) is stronger than the US army, "
Good joke. Haven't laughed this hard for long time.