If I remember correctly federal workers were not granted the legal right to form unions by the legislation authorizing non government workers to unionize. They were granted that privilege by Presidential Executive Order (Possibly President Kennedy). This was done under the principle that all Executive Branch authority rest in one person, the President. If my memory on this is correct, then the Executive Order allowing federal employee unions could be cancelled by a new order by President Trump. With this order, the unions would be dissolved thus nullifying the last minute agreement on work at home authority signed with the unions by the Biden Administration. Brings to mind the old saying about being careful what you ask for as you might get it.
JFK did create the ability for federal unions to organize. It was later codified into law by the civil service laws. Rescinding this executive order wouldn't change anything - it will require an act of congress. I know this because I used to think like you did - but then I researched it. Here is the AI answer you're looking for:
Rescinding Executive Order 10988, issued by President John F. Kennedy in 1962, would not automatically end unions in the federal government. While this executive order was a significant milestone in granting federal employees the right to unionize and collectively bargain, subsequent legislation and executive orders have further codified and expanded these rights.
The impact of rescinding Executive Order 10988 would be limited for several reasons:
1. Subsequent legislation: The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 codified many of the principles and concepts found in Executive Order 10988 into law. This act established the Federal Labor Relations Authority and provided a statutory basis for federal employee unions.
2. Expanded executive orders: President Richard Nixon’s Executive Order 11491 in 1969 replaced and expanded upon Kennedy’s order, further developing the framework for labor-management relations in the federal government.
3. Established practices: Over the past six decades, federal employee unions have become deeply integrated into the federal workforce, with established practices, procedures, and legal precedents.
4. Legal challenges: Any attempt to completely eliminate federal employee unions would likely face significant legal challenges based on constitutional grounds and existing labor laws.
However, rescinding Executive Order 10988 could potentially be part of a broader effort to reduce the power and influence of federal employee unions. Such an action might signal a shift in policy and could be followed by additional executive orders or legislative efforts to limit union rights.
It’s important to note that changes to federal labor relations often occur incrementally and are subject to political, legal, and administrative processes. While rescinding Executive Order 10988 alone would not end federal employee unions, it could be seen as a symbolic move or the beginning of a larger policy shift regarding federal labor relations.
Thanks for sharing your research. I haven't had occasion to consider this subject for many years and wasn't aware of the later events. I appreciate you bringing me up to date.
If I remember correctly federal workers were not granted the legal right to form unions by the legislation authorizing non government workers to unionize. They were granted that privilege by Presidential Executive Order (Possibly President Kennedy). This was done under the principle that all Executive Branch authority rest in one person, the President. If my memory on this is correct, then the Executive Order allowing federal employee unions could be cancelled by a new order by President Trump. With this order, the unions would be dissolved thus nullifying the last minute agreement on work at home authority signed with the unions by the Biden Administration. Brings to mind the old saying about being careful what you ask for as you might get it.
JFK did create the ability for federal unions to organize. It was later codified into law by the civil service laws. Rescinding this executive order wouldn't change anything - it will require an act of congress. I know this because I used to think like you did - but then I researched it. Here is the AI answer you're looking for:
Rescinding Executive Order 10988, issued by President John F. Kennedy in 1962, would not automatically end unions in the federal government. While this executive order was a significant milestone in granting federal employees the right to unionize and collectively bargain, subsequent legislation and executive orders have further codified and expanded these rights. The impact of rescinding Executive Order 10988 would be limited for several reasons: 1. Subsequent legislation: The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 codified many of the principles and concepts found in Executive Order 10988 into law. This act established the Federal Labor Relations Authority and provided a statutory basis for federal employee unions. 2. Expanded executive orders: President Richard Nixon’s Executive Order 11491 in 1969 replaced and expanded upon Kennedy’s order, further developing the framework for labor-management relations in the federal government. 3. Established practices: Over the past six decades, federal employee unions have become deeply integrated into the federal workforce, with established practices, procedures, and legal precedents. 4. Legal challenges: Any attempt to completely eliminate federal employee unions would likely face significant legal challenges based on constitutional grounds and existing labor laws. However, rescinding Executive Order 10988 could potentially be part of a broader effort to reduce the power and influence of federal employee unions. Such an action might signal a shift in policy and could be followed by additional executive orders or legislative efforts to limit union rights. It’s important to note that changes to federal labor relations often occur incrementally and are subject to political, legal, and administrative processes. While rescinding Executive Order 10988 alone would not end federal employee unions, it could be seen as a symbolic move or the beginning of a larger policy shift regarding federal labor relations.
Thanks for sharing your research. I haven't had occasion to consider this subject for many years and wasn't aware of the later events. I appreciate you bringing me up to date.