Rand is starting to really piss me off. Rand should go ask the victims of cartel terrorism (and their families) if they think what happened to the boat boys was unfair, before he goes running his dumbfuck mouth to try to virtue signal to the pro-terrorism crowd.
I completely understand the worry about the use of drones on civilians, but Rand Paul seems to have far too rigid a definition of civilian. You’ve got Paramilitary groups, you’ve got militia, you’ve got insurgents, terrorists, private military groups, soldiers for hire, etc.
Cartels may perfectly not fit the definition of terrorist that has been in the public eye for the past couple decades, but they very much fit the bill from an economic and cultural standpoint. They may not be the same as Islamic terrorists who have goals of destroying or dominating the world, but you better believe they want a piece of the economic action world-wide and they thrive under specific cultural norms.
Their existence is in direct contention with what we want from our country. Much like Islamic terrorists, they don’t represent a specific country or government, but that never stopped us with pirates in the past. Harbor pirates who are targeting our shipping lanes? You best get out of the way when we come for them. Same principle should be applied to terrorists and cartels.
TLDR: droning civilians is bad, sure, but cartels aren’t civilians. We’ve gone after pirates, terrorists, and those that harbor such groups in the past, why not treat cartels the same way?
I used to like this dude. He’s exposed himself as a RINO piece of shit. Getting his ass kicked in the yard turned him into a pussy.
Kentucky is full of RINO's....
Dear rino faggot Rand Paul, your father I'm sure hates you for becoming everything he fought for.
Rand is starting to really piss me off. Rand should go ask the victims of cartel terrorism (and their families) if they think what happened to the boat boys was unfair, before he goes running his dumbfuck mouth to try to virtue signal to the pro-terrorism crowd.
I completely understand the worry about the use of drones on civilians, but Rand Paul seems to have far too rigid a definition of civilian. You’ve got Paramilitary groups, you’ve got militia, you’ve got insurgents, terrorists, private military groups, soldiers for hire, etc.
Cartels may perfectly not fit the definition of terrorist that has been in the public eye for the past couple decades, but they very much fit the bill from an economic and cultural standpoint. They may not be the same as Islamic terrorists who have goals of destroying or dominating the world, but you better believe they want a piece of the economic action world-wide and they thrive under specific cultural norms.
Their existence is in direct contention with what we want from our country. Much like Islamic terrorists, they don’t represent a specific country or government, but that never stopped us with pirates in the past. Harbor pirates who are targeting our shipping lanes? You best get out of the way when we come for them. Same principle should be applied to terrorists and cartels.
TLDR: droning civilians is bad, sure, but cartels aren’t civilians. We’ve gone after pirates, terrorists, and those that harbor such groups in the past, why not treat cartels the same way?