We can - That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.

Care to see another example of the massive crap massie attempts is action

The U.S. House of Representatives voted on February 11, 2026, to pass H.J. Res. 72, a resolution to terminate the national emergency declaration that President Trump used to impose 25% tariffs on most Canadian goods (enacted via Executive Order in early 2025, tied to concerns over fentanyl and border security issues). The vote was 219-211, with six Republicans crossing party lines to join nearly all Democrats in support. Only one Democrat (Rep. Jared Golden of Maine) voted against it.The six Republicans who voted yes were:Don Bacon (NE) Brian Fitzpatrick (PA) Jeff Hurd (CO) Kevin Kiley (CA) Thomas Massie (KY) Dan Newhouse (WA)

This followed a procedural vote the day before where a few Republicans helped defeat an effort by GOP leadership to block such disapproval resolutions until later in the year.What Comes Next?The resolution now heads to the Senate, where similar measures have already passed in prior votes (e.g., bipartisan efforts led by figures like Sens. Amy Klobuchar, Tim Kaine, and Rand Paul to block or repeal these tariffs). If the Senate also approves it (likely with some Republican support, given past patterns), the joint resolution would go to President Trump for his signature.Trump has strongly defended the tariffs as necessary for national security and trade leverage, and he has threatened political "consequences" (including primary challenges) against Republicans who oppose them. He is almost certain to veto the resolution if it reaches his desk.Overriding a veto would require a two-thirds majority in both chambers (290 votes in the House and 67 in the Senate), which is highly unlikely given the narrow House margin and Republican control/control-leaning dynamics. The vote did not achieve veto-proof levels.