I’m not sure exactly what all they were communicating, but I do know when I read that article back in mid-October, I knew they were at the very least signaling that the state courts were all highly infiltrated. I’m sure there is much more to it.

We do know many of those seemingly random “news” pieces leading up to the election were not random in the slightest. It’s just very difficult putting all the pieces together with no hindsight, although a lot of those comms were pretty obvious.

I’m not sure exactly what all they were communicating, but I do know when I read that article back in mid-October, I knew they were at the very least signaling that the state courts were all highly infiltrated. I’m sure there is much more to it.

We do know many of those seemingly random “news” pieces leading up to the election were not random in the slightest. It’s just very difficult putting all the pieces together with no hindsight, although a lot of those comms were pretty obvious.

I’m not sure exactly what all they were communicating, but I do know when I read that article back in mid-October, I knew they were at the very least signaling that the state courts were all highly infiltrated. I’m sure there is much more to it.

We do know many of those seemingly random “news” pieces leading up to the election were not random in the slightest. It’s just very difficult putting all the pieces together with no hindsight, although a lot of those comms are pretty obvious.

I’m not sure exactly what all they were communicating, but I do know when I read that article back in mid-October, I knew they were at the very least signaling that the state courts were all highly infiltrated. I’m sure there is much more to it.

Many of those seemingly random “news” pieces leading up to the election were not random in the slightest.