Curious you mention MSM - nobody in the Q movement believes anything from them - this is a Q site in case you haven't noticed and people have been researching all sorts of stuff and connections for going on for 5 years. If there was a blood connection it would have been found.

Justin Trudeau is very like Castro and there IS a proven connection with his mother and the timing, pregnancy, age etc. Without a DNA test one cannot be certain but balance of probability says he almost certainly is. Chester Bennigton looks very like John Podesta and there is a proven connection there too. Shakier with Barbra Bush and Aleister Crowley, but enough connections with Pauline Pierce to say it is possible she was his offspring. The Scherff family = Bushes also has some meat to it. (see https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_bush19.htm )

The same people who have been digging relentlessly for almost 5 years have not found ANY connection linking the Trumps and Assange families. Zip. If it was there the autists would have found it.

Assange has a very shaky connection with Rothschilds (or might be the Rockefellers can't remember) but it is not enough to conclude that he is definitely of their family line either.

The only real family line of interest with Trump is John G and his connection with Tesla. And then there is the curious case of Homer Trump (I shit you not, the dudes name was Homer), a mysterious group of inventors and scientists in Sonora in the late 1800s, and a secret society called Plus Ultra (they could be described as 'White Hats'). Intriguingly, the Ingersoll Lockwood books came out in that time frame. Hmm.

Zero connection with the 13 families who comprise the 'Elites' or their various offspring and minions (don't mistake being rich with being 'elite', only lefties who look for excuses for their own failures blame the 'rich' for controlling it ALL and preventing them from being rich also. (Hell my brother was a millionaire and would have been a multimillionaire if he lived. We are from a VERY blue collar family. He worked 80 hrs a week to achieve what he did, no elite connections required. He also appeared in public and local TV, still without needing any elite connections. They do not control EVERYTHING, that in itself is a conspiracy theory. It may be if he got further he may have been approached by these people, but frankly they only pick people who are useful to them in some ways. Not everyone gets the offer - the gig would soon be up if everyone could be connected, even though many are at the very top - perhaps most - but working hard and gaining a few millions doesn't automatically mean you are 'one of them'.

As for the doppleganger stats, you are just plucking statistics out of your ass to sound impressive, but it is bullshit. Stats can be used to prove/disprove anything. Dopplegangers aren't THAT rare. There are only so many combinations of facial features and unlike fingerprints and ears, faces are not unique. It is a suprise we don't see more people who look like ourselves.

If he was John G son he would be around 70 years old. Look at DJTs sons, are they duplicates? They share characteristics of both parents, and Ivanas genes are more doiminant physically. Except for Baron. Baron resembles him the most (he is also a duplicate of the kid in Ingersoll Lockwoods book - go look at that kid and compare his face to Baron on election night). While a real lookalike can come along generations later as a 'throwback', I repeat there has been no connection with Trump>Assange families. If it was his grandson then the mother must have had bland features because the Trump physical genes are not that dominant. Until some coinnection is found that is just speculation and the easiest non-thinking explanation.

Other explanations for Assange/John G resemblance aside from the lazy familial claim, and just a meaningless doppleganger, are the time traveler because of the Tesla connection and Trumps habit of stating things that later prove true although he is mocked at the time. Even Hawking towards the end of his life changed his mind about the possibility of time travel. If at some point in the future they will discover and refine it, well it wouldn't be a surprise if any of them arrive in our time period would it? There are little clues dropped along the way that shows it really cannot be discounted.

There is evidence, mailnly anecdotal, that they have perfected cloning and aging people, and it is more than the Trump>Assange family connection. But you won't be able to consider that possibility either, because you seem to fear the 'conspiracy' label. Newsflash, merely being involved with Q research immediately tags you as a conspiracy nutter to normies. You need to drop your fear of that.

Q did say when they go above the 40,000 feet 'view' and he was hinting at certain stuff, that the danger is the higher they go the more it all sounds like wild conspiracy and most people can't handle that. He appeared to feel things out at a certain point and clearly decided we weren't ready - this was before the mention of Project Looking Glass btw. He then decided, to paraphrase, 'cruise back down below 40,000 feet altitude' and said the truth won't be for everyone.

Feel free to remain below that altitude convinced that absolutely EVERYONE in public is part of the same families and that there can never be any variables. But don't delude yourself you know anything. I have been at this for well over 30 years, even before the internet came around and every certainty I have had along the way gets smashed when contrary information that cannot be dismissed comes to light.

Fact is, non of us know shit, we can only work with what we have and accept or reject. Some 'realities' are more simplistic than others, it depends on how far ones perceptions can expand.

As our fren says, in the end the choice to know will be yours. If you think you already know what is Truth then you have immediately limited yourself and will only accept the things you are comfortable with.

TLDR: Don't lecture others on what is fact or not and what is possible or not when you clearly know jackshit yourself.

Curious you mention MSM - nobody in the Q movement believes anything from them - this is a Q site in case you haven't noticed and people have been researching all sorts of stuff and connections for going on for 5 years. If there was a blood connection it would have been found.

Justin Trudeau is very like Castro and there IS a proven connection with his mother and the timing, pregnancy, age etc. Without a DNA test one cannot be certain but balance of probability says he almost certainly is. Chester Bennigton looks very like John Podesta and there is a proven connection there too. Shakier with Barbra Bush and Aleister Crowley, but enough connections with Pauline Pierce to say it is possible she was his offspring. The Scherff family = Bushes also has some meat to it. (see https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_bush19.htm )

The same people who have been digging relentlessly for almost 5 years have not found ANY connection linking the Trumps and Assange families. Zip. If it was there the autists would have found it.

Assange has a very shaky connection with Rothschilds (or might be the Rockefellers can't remember) but it is not enough to conclude that he is definitely of their family line either.

The only real family line of interest with Trump is John G and his connection with Tesla. And then there is the curious case of Homer Trump (I shit you not, the dudes name was Homer), a mysterious group of inventors and scientists in Sonora in the late 1800s, and a secret society called Plus Ultra (they could be described as 'White Hats'). Intriguingly, the Ingersoll Lockwood books came out in that time frame. Hmm.

Zero connection with the 13 families who comprise the 'Elites' or their various offspring and minions (don't mistake being rich with being 'elite', only lefties who look for excuses for their own failures blame the 'rich' for controlling it ALL and preventing them from being rich also. (Hell my brother was a millionaire and would have been a multimillionaire if he lived. We are from a VERY blue collar family. He worked 80 hrs a week to achieve what he did, no elite connections required. He also appeared in public and local TV, still without needing any elite connections. They do not control EVERYTHING, that in itself is a conspiracy theory. It may be if he got further he may have been approached by these people, but frankly they only pick people who are useful to them in some ways. Not everyone gets the offer - the gig would soon be up if everyone could be connected, even though many are at the very top - perhaps most - but working hard and gaining a few millions doesn't automatically mean you are 'one of them'.

As for the doppleganger stats, you are just plucking statistics out of your ass to sound impressive, but it is bullshit. Stats can be used to prove/disprove anything. Dopplegangers aren't THAT rare. There are only so many combinations of facial features and unlike fingerprints and ears, faces are not unique. It is a suprise we don't see more people who look like ourselves.

If he was John G son he would be around 70 years old. Look at DJTs sons, are they duplicates? They share characteristics of both parents, and Ivanas genes are more doiminant physically. Except for Baron. Baron resembles him the most (he is also a duplicate of the kid in Ingersoll Lockwoods book - go look at that kid and compare his face to Baron on election night). While a real lookalike can come along generations later as a 'throwback', I repeat there has been no connection with Trump>Assange families. If it was his grandson then the mother must have had bland features because the Trump physical genes are not that dominant. Until some coinnection is found that is just speculation and the easiest non-thinking explanation.

Other explanations for Assange/John G resemblance aside from the lazy familial claim, and just a meaningless doppleganger, are the time traveler because of the Tesla connection and Trumps habit of stating things that later prove true although he is mocked at the time. Even Hawking towards the end of his life changed his mind about the possibility of time travel. If at some point in the future they will discover and refine it, well it wouldn't be a surprise if any of them arrive in our time period would it? There are little clues dropped along the way that shows it really cannot be discounted.

There is evidence, mailnly anecdotal, that they have perfected cloning and aging people, and it is more than the Trump>Assange family connection. But you won't be able to consider that possibility either, because you seem to fear the 'conspiracy' label. Newsflash, merely being involved with Q research immediately tags you as a conspiracy nutter to normies. You need to drop your fear of that.

Q did say when they go above the 40,000 feet 'view' and he was hinting at certain stuff, that the danger is the higher they go the more it all sounds like wild conspiracy and most people can't handle that. He appeared to feel things out at a certain point and clearly decided we weren't ready - this was before the mention of Project Looking Glass btw. He then decided, to paraphrase, 'cruise back down below 40,000 feet altitude' and said the truth won't be for everyone.

Feel free to remain below that altitude convinced that absolutely EVERYONE in public is part of the same families and that there can never be any variables. But don't delude yourself you know anything. I have been at this for well over over 30 years, even before the internet came around and every certainty I have had along the way gets smashed when contrary information that cannot be dismissed comes to light.

Fact is, non of us know shit, we can only work with what we have and accept or reject. Some 'realities' are more simplistic than others, it depends on how far ones perceptions can expand.

As our fren says, in the end the choice to know will be yours. If you think you already know what is Truth then you have immediately limited yourself and will only accept the things you are comfortable with.

TLDR: Don't lecture others on what is fact or not and what is possible or not when you clearly know jackshit yourself.

Curious you mention MSM - nobody in the Q movement believes anything from them - this is a Q site in case you haven't noticed and people have been researching all sorts of stuff and connections for going on for 5 years. If there was a blood connection it would have been found.

Justin Trudeau is very like Castro and there IS a proven connection with his mother and the timing, pregnancy, age etc. Without a DNA test one cannot be certain but balance of probability says he almost certainly is. Chester Bennigton looks very like John Podesta and there is a proven connection there too. Shakier with Barbra Bush and Aleister Crowley, but enough connections with Pauline Pierce to say it is possible she was his offspring. The Scherff family = Bushes also has some meat to it. (see https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_bush19.htm )

The same people who have been digging relentlessly for almost 5 years have not found ANY connection linking the Trumps and Assange families. Zip. If it was there the autists would have found it.

Assange has a very shaky connection with Rothschilds (or might be the Rockefellers can't remember) but it is not enough to conclude that he is definitely of their family line either.

The only real family line of interest with Trump is John G and his connection with Tesla. And then there is the curious case of Homer Trump (I shit you not, the dudes name was Homer), a mysterious group of inventors and scientists in Sonora in the late 1800s, and a secret society called Plus Ultra (they could be described as 'White Hats'). Intriguingly, the Ingersoll Lockwood books came out in that time frame. Hmm.

Zero connection with the 13 families who comprise the 'Elites' or their various offspring and minions (don't mistake being rich with being 'elite', only lefties who look for excuses for their own failures blame the 'rich' for controlling it ALL and preventing them from being rich also. (Hell my brother was a millionaire and would have been a multimillionaire if he lived. We are from a VERY blue collar family. He worked 80 hrs a week to achieve what he did, no elite connections required. He also appeared in public and local TV, still without needing any elite connections. They do not control EVERYTHING, that in itself is a conspiracy theory. It may be if he got further he may have been approached by these people, but frankly they only pick people who are useful to them in some ways. Not everyone gets the offer - the gig would soon be up if everyone could be connected, even though many are at the very top - perhaps most - but working hard and gaining a few millions doesn't automatically mean you are 'one of them'.

As for the doppleganger stats, you are just plucking statistics out of your ass to sound impressive, but it is bullshit. Stats can be used to prove/disprove anything. Dopplegangers aren't THAT rare. There are only so many combinations of facial features and unlike fingerprints and ears, faces are not unique. It is a suprise we don't see more people who look like ourselves.

If he was John G son he would be around 70 years old. Look at DJTs sons, are they duplicates? They share characteristics of both parents, and Ivanas genes are more doiminant physically. Except for Baron. Baron resembles him the most (he is also a duplicate of the kid in Ingersoll Lockwoods book - go look at that kid and compare his face to Baron on election night). While a real lookalike can come along generations later as a 'throwback', I repeat there has been no connection with Trump>Assange families. If it was his grandson then the mother must have had bland features because the Trump physical genes are not that dominant. Until some coinnection is found that is just speculation and the easiest non-thinking explanation.

Other explanations for Assange/John G resemblance aside from the lazy familial claim, and just a meaningless doppleganger, are the time traveler because of the Tesla connection and Trumps habit of stating things that later prove true although he is mocked at the time. Even Hawking towards the end of his life changed his mind about the possibility of time travel. If at some point in the future they will discover and refine it, well it wouldn't be a surprise if any of them arrive in our time period would it? There are little clues dropped along the way that shows it really cannot be discounted.

There is evidence, mailnly anecdotal, that they have perfected cloning and aging people, and it is more than the Trump>Assange family connection. But you won't be able to consider that possibility either, because you seem to fear the 'conspiracy' label. Newsflash, merely being involved with Q research immediately tags you as a conspiracy nutter to normies. You need to drop your fear of that.

Q did say when they go above the 40,000 feet 'view' and he was hinting at certain stuff, that the danger is the higher they go the more it all sounds like wild conspiracy and most people can't handle that. He appeared to feel things out at a certain point and clearly decided we weren't ready - this was before the mention of Project Looking Glass btw. He then decided, to paraphrase, 'cruise back down below 40,000 feet altitude' and said the truth won't be for everyone.

Feel free to remain below that altitude convinced that absolutely EVERYONE in public is part of the same families and that there can never be any variables. But don't delude yourself you know anything. I have been at this for over 30 years, long before the internet came around and every certainty I have had along the way gets smashed when contrary information that cannot be dismissed comes to light.

Fact is, non of us know shit, we can only work with what we have and accept or reject. Some 'realities' are more simplistic than others, it depends on how far ones perceptions can expand.

As our fren says, in the end the choice to know will be yours. If you think you already know what is Truth then you have immediately limited yourself and will only accept the things you are comfortable with.

TLDR: Don't lecture others on what is fact or not and what is possible or not when you clearly know jackshit yourself.

Curious you mention MSM - nobody in the Q movement believes anything from them - this is a Q site in case you haven't noticed and people have been researching all sorts of stuff and connections for going on for 5 years. If there was a blood connection it would have been found.

Justin Trudeau is very like Castro and there IS a proven connection with his mother and the timing, pregnancy, age etc. Without a DNA test one cannot be certain but balance of probability says he almost certainly is. Chester Bennigton looks very like John Podesta and there is a proven connection there too. Shakier with Barbra Bush and Aleister Crowley, but enough connections with Pauline Pierce to say it is possible she was his offspring. The Scherff family = Bushes also has some meat to it. (see https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_bush19.htm )

The same people who have been digging relentlessly for almost 5 years have not found ANY connection linking the Trumps and Assange families. Zip. If it was there the autists would have found it.

Assange has a very shaky connection with Rothschilds (or might be the Rockefellers can't remember) but it is not enough to conclude that he is definitely of their family line either.

The only real family line of interest with Trump is John G and his connection with Tesla. And then there is the curious case of Homer Trump (I shit you not, the dudes name was Homer), a mysterious group of inventors and scientists in Sonora in the late 1800s, and a secret society called Plus Ultra (they could be described as 'White Hats'). Intriguingly, the Ingersoll Lockwood books came out in that time frame. Hmm.

Zero connection with the 13 families who comprise the 'Elites' or their various offspring and minions (don't mistake being rich with being 'elite', only lefties who look for excuses for their own failures blame the 'rich' for controlling it ALL and preventing them from being rich also. (Hell my brother was a millionaire and would have been a multimillionaire if he lived. We are from a VERY blue collar family. He worked 80 hrs a week to achieve what he did, no elite connections required. He also appeared in public and local TV, still without needing any elite connections. They do not control EVERYTHING, that in itself is a conspiracy theory. It may be if he got further he may have been approached by these people, but frankly they only pick people who are useful to them in some ways. Not everyone gets the offer - the gig would soon be up if everyone could be connected, even though many are at the very top - perhaps most - but working hard and gaining a few millions doesn't automatically mean you are 'one of them'.

As for the doppleganger stats, you are just plucking statistics out of your ass to sound impressive, but it is bullshit. Stats can be used to prove/disprove anything. Dopplegangers aren't THAT rare. There are only so many combinations of facial features and unlike fingerprints and ears, faces are not unique. It is a suprise we don't see more people who look like ourselves.

If he was John G son he would be around 70 years old. Look at DJTs sons, are they duplicates? They share characteristics of both parents, and Ivanas genes are more doiminant physically. Except for Baron. Baron resembles him the most (he is also a duplicate of the kid in Ingersoll Lockwoods book - go look at that kid and compare his face to Baron on election night). While a real lookalike can come along generations later as a 'throwback', I repeat there has been no connection with Trump>Assange families. If it was his grandson then the mother must have had bland features because the Trump physical genes are not that dominant. Until some coinnection is found that is just speculation and the easiest non-thinking explanation.

Other explanations for Assange/John G resemblance aside from the lazy familial claim, and just a meaningless doppleganger, are the time traveler because of the Tesla connection and Trumps habit of stating things that later prove true although he is mocked at the time. Even Hawking towards the end of his life changed his mind about the possibility of time travel. If at some point in the future they will discover and refine it, well it wouldn't be a surprise if any of them arrive in our time period would it? There are little clues dropped along the way that shows it really cannot be discounted.

There is evidence, mailnly anecdotal, that they have perfected cloning and aging people, and it it more than the Trump>Assange family connection. But you won't be able to consider that possibility either, because you seem to fear the 'conspiracy' label. Newsflash, merely being involved with Q research immediately tags you as a conspiracy nutter to normies. You need to drop your fear of that.

Q did say when they go above the 40,000 feet 'view' and he was hinting at certain stuff, that the danger is the higher they go the more it all sounds like wild conspiracy and most people can't handle that. He appeared to feel things out at a certain point and clearly decided we weren't ready - this was before the mention of Project Looking Glass btw. He then decided, to paraphrase, 'cruise back down below 40,000 feet altitude' and said the truth won't be for everyone.

Feel free to remain below that altitude convinced that absolutely EVERYONE in public is part of the same families and that there can never be any variables. But don't delude yourself you know anything. I have been at this for over 30 years, long before the internet came around and every certainty I have had along the way gets smashed when contrary information that cannot be dismissed comes to light.

Fact is, non of us know shit, we can only work with what we have and accept or reject. Some 'realities' are more simplistic than others, it depends on how far ones perceptions can expand.

As our fren says, in the end the choice to know will be yours. If you think you already know what is Truth then you have immediately limited yourself and will only accept the things you are comfortable with.

TLDR: Don't lecture others on what is fact or not and what is possible or not when you clearly know jackshit yourself.