Their big reason? They say a scatter plot shows two clearly distinct collections of dots. The chart showed a clear difference in style between the first Q messages from October 28 to Dec 1 2017. “The signal difference is strong enough to leave very little doubt on this authors swap.”

I checked out the drops between then, that’s when Q started signing his posts with a Q at the end. He started in November and by December he’s always signing Q at the end.

I think that was their big finding because they can’t analyze anything about the speech patterns because they say literally nothing else about their findings other than they are certain it’s 2 people.

Their big reason? They say a scatter plot shows two clearly distinct collections of dots. The chart showed a clear difference in style between the first Q messages from October 28 to Dec 1 2017. “The signal difference is strong enough to leave very little doubt on this authors swap.” I checked out the drops between then, that’s when Q started signing his posts with a Q at the end. He started in November and by December he’s always signing Q at the end. I think that was their big finding because they can’t analyze anything about the speech patterns because they say literally nothing else about their findings other than they are certain it’s 2 people.

Their big reason? They say a scatter plot shows two clearly distinct collects of dots. The chart showed a clear difference in style between the first Q messages from October 28 to Dec 1 2017. “The signal difference is strong enough to leave very little doubt on this authors swap.”

I checked out the drops between then, that’s when Q started signing his posts with a Q at the end. He started in November and by December he’s always signing Q at the end.

I think that was their big finding because they can’t analyze anything about the speech patterns because they say literally nothing else about their findings other than they are certain it’s 2 people.