Yes, the legal efforts would be met with strong resistance, to say the least, as a result of the corrupted judiciary system you refer to. But there is a small chance the efforts listed above, combined with other ideas, may bear some fruit.

The (military) options are a tough pill, given the consequences, but might be necessary given the alternatives.

Another possibility would be red states seceding (which might be a bad mid-to-long term approach, given that they'd be more susceptible to foreign influence, and, subversion by the blue states would possibly occur over time).

Such an option could be strengthened though, if the red states included ND, SD, NE, KS, OK, TX, and maybe MT, because you could end up seeing Alberta, Saskatchewan and perhaps part of Manitoba join them (by leaving Canada). The first two are more conservative (and are unhappy with their current status in Canada), and the lower part of Manitoba seems to be conservative as well. That adds oil and agriculture economies to the red states. Less likely to occur, but if it did, parts of Northwest Ontario could break off and be added to this group. This region primarily runs on mining and lumber industries, with some tourism for fishing & hunting.

Yes, the legal efforts would be met with strong resistance, to say the least, as a result of the corrupted judiciary system you refer to. But there is a small chance the efforts listed above, combined with other ideas, may bear some fruit.

The (military) options are a tough pill, given the consequences, but might be necessary given the alternatives.

Another possibility would be red states seceding (which is might be a bad mid-to-long term approach, given that they'd be more susceptible to foreign influence, and, subversion by the blue states would occur).

Such an option could be strengthened though, if the red states included ND, SD, NE, KS, OK, TX, and maybe MT, because you could end up seeing Alberta, Saskatchewan and perhaps part of Manitoba join them (by leaving Canada). The first two are more conservative (and are unhappy with their current status in Canada), and the lower part of Manitoba seems to be conservative as well. That adds oil and agriculture economies to the red states. Less likely to occur, but if it did, parts of Northwest Ontario could break off and be added to this group. This region primarily runs on mining and lumber industries, with some tourism for fishing & hunting.

Yes, the legal efforts would be met with strong resistance, to say the least, as a result of the corrupted judiciary system you refer to. But there is a small chance the efforts listed above, combined with other ideas, may bear some fruit.

The (military) options are a tough pill, given the consequences, but might be necessary given the alternatives.

Another possibility would be red states seceding (which is probably a bad mid-to-long term approach, given that they'd be more susceptible to foreign influence, and, subversion by the blue states would occur).

If these red states included ND, SD, NE, KS, OK, TX, and maybe MT, you could end up seeing Alberta, Saskatchewan and perhaps part of Manitoba join them (by leaving Canada). The first two are more conservative (and are unhappy with their current status in Canada), and the lower part of Manitoba seems to be conservative as well. That adds oil and agriculture economies to the red states. Less likely to occur, but if it did, parts of Northwest Ontario could break off and be added to this group. This region primarily runs on mining and lumber industries, with some tourism for fishing & hunting.

Yes, the legal efforts would be met with strong resistance, to say the least, as a result of the corrupted judiciary system you refer to. But there is a small chance the efforts listed above, combined with other ideas, may bear some fruit.

The (military) options probably are less desirable, given the consequences.

Another possibility would be red states seceding (which is probably a bad mid-to-long term approach, given that they'd be more susceptible to foreign influence, and, subversion by the blue states would occur).

If these red states included ND, SD, NE, KS, OK, TX, and maybe MT, you could end up seeing Alberta, Saskatchewan and perhaps part of Manitoba join them (by leaving Canada). The first two are more conservative (and are unhappy with their current status in Canada), and the lower part of Manitoba seems to be conservative as well. That adds oil and agriculture economies to the red states. Less likely to occur, but if it did, parts of Northwest Ontario could break off and be added to this group. This region primarily runs on mining and lumber industries, with some tourism for fishing & hunting.

Yes, the legal efforts would be met with strong resistance, to say the least, as a result of the corrupted judiciary system you refer to. But there is a small chance the efforts listed above, combined with other ideas, may bear some fruit.

The (military) options probably are less desirable, given the consequences.

Another possibility would be red states seceding (which is probably a bad mid-to-long term approach, given that they'd be more susceptible to foreign influence, and, subversion by the blue states would occur).

If these red states included ND, SD, NE, KS, OK, TX, and maybe MT, you could end up seeing Alberta, Saskatchewan and perhaps part of Manitoba join them (by leaving Canada). The first two are more conservative (and are unhappy with their current status in Canada), and the lower part of Manitoba seems to be conservative as well. That adds oil and agriculture economies to the red states.