Basically, high up staff members near Trump leaked their playbook directly to the public so we could 1.) Learn 2.) Spread the message 3.) Understand the bird-eye view of the plan.
Some of the "breadcrumbs" that were dropped had descriptions or messages describing future events. They are cryptic so DS can't figure out what they're doing. They are also meant to look "random" so a normie looking at it will dismiss it. Plausible deniability.
To communicate, there are special rules that have to be followed. Usually you look for matching timestamps or specific patterns. To VERIFY that you're looking at something from Q and not just mumbo-jumbo, there is some proof at the end that lets you know it wasn't just a coincidence.
For example, in the farewell speech Trump signed "Q" in Morse Code. By itself, people would think, maybe it was just a coincidence that he moved his hands like that. However, he kept his hands down for most of the video (with 2 occurrences of barely lifting them up) and he did the gesture at 4:20. In an early Q breadcrumb, it stated numbers can be replaced by letter and vice versa A=1, B=2, C=3. So using the rules of Q, Trump signed in morse code Q AND did it at 4:20 which is DT... his initials. At this point we can say, okay, Trump is trying to communicate with us.
For this thread: This breadcrumb is remarkable in its accuracy describing our current day situation. National Guard deployed? Yes. Pacific fleet? Yes. It says "Follow Huma". SO when you go to Huma's Twitter account, there's a new tweet with:
"Let there be light..."
Another Q phrase used many times is: From Darkness to Light. This could be a clue. Q also loves biblical scripture and this tweet follows a biblical theme, another connection. So there's potential that this tweet is from Q. The most interesting thing is that "Huma" hasn't tweeted since Sep. 2nd 2018 AND she used @FLOTUS and @POTUS (no names). It's as if this was a scheduled tweet set months ago before the Democratic nominees were known.
Regardless, this is a very interesting proof. I would still like to verify, Where's Huma? What if she did tweet this on her own? that would negate this proof. The breadcrumb said the NG would be deployed "the next day". Does that mean there was a clue for this specific breadcrumb that we all missed? That could solidify this.
I hope this helps, also you can watch this vid:
Basically, high up staff members near Trump leaked their playbook directly to the public so we could 1.) Learn 2.) Spread the message 3.) Understand the bird-eye view of the plan.
Some of the "breadcrumbs" that were dropped had descriptions or messages describing future events. They are cryptic so DS can't figure out what they're doing. They are also meant to look "random" so a normie looking at it will dismiss it. Plausible deniability.
To communicate, there are special rules that have to be followed. Usually you look for matching timestamps or specific patterns. To VERIFY that you're looking at something from Q and not just mumbo-jumbo, there is some proof at the end that lets you know it wasn't just a coincidence.
For example, in the farewell speech Trump signed "Q" in Morse Code. By itself, people would think, maybe it was just a coincidence that he moved his hands like that. However, he kept his hands down for most of the video (with 2 occurrences of barely lifting them up) and he did the gesture at 4:20. In an early Q breadcrumb, it stated numbers can be replaced by letter and vice versa A=1, B=2, C=3. So using the rules of Q, Trump signed in morse code Q AND did it at 4:20 which is DT... his initials. At this point we can say, okay, Trump is trying to communicate with us.
For this thread: This breadcrumb is remarkable in its accuracy describing our current day situation. National Guard deployed? It says "Follow Huma". SO when you go to Huma's Twitter account, there's a new tweet with:
"Let there be light..."
Another Q phrase used many times is: From Darkness to Light and it follows a biblical theme, another Q favorite. So there's potential that this tweet is from Q. The most interesting thing is that "Huma" hasn't tweeted since Sep. 2nd 2018 AND she used @FLOTUS and @POTUS (no names). It's as if this was a scheduled tweet set months ago before the Democratic nominees were known.
Regardless, this is a very interesting proof. I would still like to verify, Where's Huma? What if she did tweet this on her own? that would negate this proof. The breadcrumb said the NG would be deployed "the next day". Does that mean there was a clue for this specific breadcrumb that we all missed? That could solidify this.
I hope this helps, also you can watch this vid: