I was a normie about a month ago, but the constant insane attacks on my president and my disappointment that the liberty-loving country I thought I lived in was full of germ cowards who were willing to trade away their livelihood and freedom for $1200 bribe started the awakening and of course the stolen election brought me to full consciousness;
Now I am riding the fringe, believing that Satanists and pedophiles run DC with bribery and blackmail. Honestly, I don't even know how I got this far in. X22report was the start I think.
My point is this.... In the short month I have been here I have been exposed to theories about time travel, aliens, a cabal that goes back centuries, Vatican controlling our government for over 100 years, a worldwide conspiracy, cannibalism.
I realize that Q has offered enough proofs to believe what he has said. But many other theories seem to jump onboard with Q and because they attach themselves they acquire Qs credibility even though Q has not passed judgment upon them.
It is not a bad idea to remember what Q has actually said or alluded to. As I said I am still learning and I am trying to discern what has been said, what has been alluded to and what has been supposed and what is flat out made up.
I was a normie about a month ago, but the constant insane attacks on my president and my disappointment that the liberty-loving country I thought I lived in was full germ cowards who were willing to trade away their livelihood and freedom for $1200 bribe started the awakening and of course the stolen election brought me to full consciousness;
Now I am riding the fringe, believing that Satanists and pedophiles run DC with bribery and blackmail. Honestly, I don't even know how I got this far in. X22report was the start I think.
My point is this.... In the short month I have been here I have been exposed to theories about time travel, aliens, a cabal that goes back centuries, Vatican controlling our government for over 100 years, a worldwide conspiracy, cannibalism.
I realize that Q has offered enough proofs to believe what he has said. But many other theories seem to jump onboard with Q and because they attach themselves they acquire Qs credibility even though Q has not passed judgment upon them.
It is not a bad idea to remember what Q has actually said or alluded to. As I said I am still learning and I am trying to discern what has been said, what has been alluded to and what has been supposed and what is flat out made up.