I have yet to see anyone making the US Corporation argument ever provide actual evidence, rather than assertions, to support it.
Every single section of the 1871 Act, when reading it, is in reference not to the entire USA but to the District of Columbia, and specifically states it is limited to "all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia”. Many cities are set up as municipal corporations. That was not unusual.
As Troglodyte said, ending the US Constitution and Republic and creating an (alleged) new form of government is not so simple as passing an Act.
For some reason I do not know, many are very determined to push this theory, even though they never actually back it up.
I was actually thrown off a Patriot (?) board for consistently asking for evidence on this and pointing out none was ever being given.
Until someone can back it up that it extends to anything beyond what it says, namely the District of Columbia itself, to me it's a disinfo campaign that has gotten many way off track.
Also as pointed out, Q has never advanced this at all, whatsoever.
What this idea does is, it pretty much will discredit any Patriot to his neighbor or friends when he goes on about it. Maybe they were listening up to then, but any number will decide someone is a nut when they argue this theory they have no substantiation for, only some weblinks that themselves provide no evidence, and anyone can read the Act for themselves and see it does not say this at all.
I have yet to see anyone making the US Corporation argument ever provide actual evidence, rather than assertions, to support it.
Every single section of the 1871 Act, when reading it, is in reference not to the entire USA but to the District of Columbia, and specifically states it is limited to "all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia”. Many cities are set up as municipal corporations. That was not unusual.
As Troglodyte said, ending the US Consitution and creating an (alleged) new form of government is not so simple as passing an Act.
For some reason I do not know, many are very determined to push this theory, even though they never actually back it up.
I was actually thrown off a Patriot (?) board for consistently asking for evidence on this and pointing out none was ever being given.
Until someone can back it up that it extends to anything beyond what it says, namely the District of Columbia itself, to me it's a disinfo campaign that has gotten many way off track.
Also as pointed out, Q has never advanced this at all, whatsoever.
What this idea does is, it pretty much will discredit any Patriot to his neighbor or friends when he goes on about it. Maybe they were listening up to then, but any number will decide someone is a nut when they argue this theory they have no substantiation for, only some weblinks that themselves provide no evidence, and anyone can read the Act for themselves and see it does not say this at all.
I have yet to see anyone making the US Corporation argument ever provide actual evidence, rather than assertions, to support it.
Every single section of the 1871 Act, when reading it, is in reference not to the entire USA but to the District of Columbia, and specifically states it is limited to "all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia”. Many cities are set up as municipal corporations. That was not unusual.
As Troglodyte said, ending the US Consitution and creating an (alleged) new form of government is not so simple as passing an Act.
For some reason I do not know, many are very determined to push this theory, even though they never actually back it up.
I was actually thrown off a Patriot (?) board for consistently asking for evidence on this and pointing out none was ever being given.
Until someone can back it up that it extends to anything beyond what it says, namely the District of Columbia itself, to me it's a disinfo campaign that has gotten many way off track.