Lol. Did you watch the actual video?
-
There's no mention of 99% of any votes going for Biden.
-
The 93% number that's mentioned in the article is a number this Republican poll watcher claims to have HEARD about in some other place else, not anything she saw in the county where she was working. In other words, right off the bat, the article is lying to you. Talk about a red flag!
-
For the 298 military ballots this woman observed in the recount of Cobb county, she ESTIMATED 80-90% went for Biden. 150,000 mail-in ballots were cast in that county. 65% went for Biden. So, yeah, if you divide 150,000 ballots into 500 stacks of ~300 ballots each, some of those stacks are gonna be 40 or 50% for Biden and some will be 80 or 90%. That's not weird at all.
In fact...
- Even in that exact same county, even looking at entire precincts - with thousands of votes, not just a few hundred - you can find precincts that went for Trump by a much bigger deviation from the county average. Check the links below (this took <10 minutes of Googling). Trump got 42% of vote in Cobb county, but in the "Mars Hill 01" precinct, he got 73%. That's a 31% deviation - bigger than even the HIGHEST END of the >estimate< from this GOP poll watcher in the video for her small stack of 298 votes that she looked at (i.e. 90% versus 65% is a difference of 25% < 73% versus 42% is a difference of 31%).
Now, go further: If you look at counties where Trump won with 65% of the vote (the margin by which Biden won the mail-in vote Cobb, i.e. the ballots referenced by the lady in the video), I GUARANTEE you will find precincts that went 90% for Trump. Easily. This happens in every election. Anyone who has worked dozens of campaigns and watched results come in precinct by precinct has seen this happen over and over in real-time.
So, what do you have here? A Republican Party worker making an estimate (with no context provided by the state employees working under the Republican Secretary of State who were there doing the recount) and even then the estimate at it's highest end is no more extreme a result than the deviations from batch to batch we see for Trump.
In other words, this is evidence of nothing.
But don't stop there. Ask yourself some questions now.
Ask yourself why, when scrutinized, all of these claims fall apart. In fact, ask yourself, if SO MUCH FRAUD really existed, why would people have to rely on circulating these bogues, out of context, ill-informed claims to begin with? Why would the website have to lie about what was said in the video? I mean, if ALL THIS FRAUD really existed, wouldn't they be able to find 5 or 10 - or even 2 or 3 - bullet proof examples of clearly organized fraud that didn't crumble under the scrutiny of 10 minutes on Google?
Think about it.
Lol. Did you watch the actual video?
-
There's no mention of 99% of any votes going for Biden.
-
The 93% number that's mentioned in the article is a number this Republican poll watcher claims to have HEARD about in some other place else, not anything she saw in the county where she was working. In other words, right off the bat, the article is lying to you. Talk about a red flag!
-
For the 298 military ballots this woman observed in the recount of Cobb county, she ESTIMATED 80-90% went for Biden. 150,000 mail-in ballots were cast in that county. 65% went for Biden. So, yeah, if you divide 150,000 ballots into 500 stacks of ~300 ballots each, some of those stacks are gonna be 40 or 50% for Biden and some will be 80 or 90%. That's not weird at all.
In fact...
- Even in that exact same county, even looking at entire precincts - with thousands of votes, not just a few hundred - you can find precincts that went for Trump by a much bigger deviation from the county average. Check the links below (this took <10 minutes of Googling). Trump got 42% of vote in Cobb county, but in the "Mars Hill 01" precinct, he got 73%. That's a 31% deviation - bigger than even the HIGHEST END of the >estimate< from this GOP poll watcher in the video for her small stack of 298 votes that she looked at (i.e. 90% versus 65% is a difference of 25% < 73% versus 42% is a difference of 31%).
Now, go further: If you look at counties where Trump won with 65% of the vote (the margin by which Biden won the mail-in vote Cobb, i.e. the ballots referenced by the lady in the video), I GUARANTEE you will find precincts that went 90% for Trump. Easily. This happens in every election. Anyone who has worked dozens of campaigns and watched results come in precinct by precinct has seen this happen over and over in real-time.
So, what do you have here? A Republican Party worker making an estimate (with no context provided by the state employees working under the Republican Secretary of State who were there doing the recount) and even then the estimate at it's highest end is no more extreme a result than the deviations from batch to batch we see for Trump.
In other words, this is evidence of nothing.
But don't stop there. Ask yourself some question now.
Ask yourself why, when scrutinized, all of these claims fall apart. In fact, ask yourself, if SO MUCH FRAUD really existed, why would people have to rely on circulating these bogues, out of context, ill-informed claims to begin with? I mean, if ALL THIS FRAUD really existed, wouldn't they be able to find 5 or 10 - or even 2 or 3 - bullet proof examples of clearly organized fraud that didn't crumble under the scrutiny of 10 minutes on Google?