75 million "reported" to have voted for Trump. If illegal vote manipulation possibilities are considered, it's closer to 80m. About Q, I will admit to early media brainwashing on the whole movement. Considering its infancy at that time, it should have made sense there was more to this. Why would they ignore the distruction from ANTIFA while attacking the curiosity of individuals causing no harm, other than to their keyboards? What does get me, from an outsider, is that right now when things are most uncertain, there is no group think promoted to dig through the drops and replay it again. I'm sure in the beginning of it all, there was lots of break down of all the drops. BTW that is missing from all archived drops. There is no action of (digital) soldiers acting in unison to reexamine what is there and consider, maybe on the first go you got it wrong. I'm not bashing or dooming. I manage numerous other trades is building design/coordination. This method of, stepping back and considering the first pass was wrong, has lead to some much cheaper fixes than originally conceived. In order to grow and accel, you must be able to assume you were wrong and reexamine all the data to see if the same conclusion is the only/logical one.

75 million "reported" to have voted for Trump. If illegal vote manipulation possibilities are considered, it's closer to 80m.

About Q, I will admit to early media brainwashing on the whole movement. Considering its infancy at that time, it should have made sense there was more to this. Why would they ignore the distruction from ANTIFA while attacking the curiosity of individuals causing no harm, other than to their keyboards?

What does get me, from an outsider, is that right now when things are most uncertain, there is no group think promoted to dig through the drops and replay it again. I'm sure in the beginning of it all, there was lots of break down of all the drops. BTW that is missing from all archived drops. There is no action of (digital) soldiers acting in unison to reexamine what is there and consider, maybe on the first go you got it wrong.

I'm not bashing or dooming. I manage numerous other trades is building design/coordination. This method of, stepping back and considering the first pass was wrong, has lead to some much cheaper fixes than originally conceived.

In order to grow and accel, you must be assume you were wrong and reexamine all the data to see if the same conclusion is the only/logical one.