Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

If you actually read the Act, which I highly recommend, you will learn a lot about who to listen to, as well as about the Act itself and that entire theory. And you will see why Q did not mention, ever, or ever base anything on that theory.

https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf

I have never seen anyone touting the theory ever provide a link to the Act. If you read for yourself, it'll be crystal clear why they don't.

3 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

If you actually read the Act, which I highly recommend, you will learn a lot about who to listen to, as well as about the Act itself and that entire theory. And you will see why Q did not mention, ever, or ever base anything on that theory.

https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf

I have never seen anyone touting the theory ever provide a link to the Act. If you read for yourself, it'll be clear why they don't.

3 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

If you actually read the Act, which I highly recommend, you will learn a lot about who to listen to, as well as about the Act itself and that entire theory. And you will see why Q did not mention, ever, or ever base anything on that theory. https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf

I have never seen anyone touting the theory ever provide a link to the Act. If you read for yourself, it'll be clear why they don't.

3 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

If you actually read the Act, which I highly recommend, you will learn a lot about who to listen to, as well as about the Act itself and that entire theory. And you will see why Q did not mention, ever, or ever base anything on that theory.

https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf

3 years ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

If you actually read the Act, which I highly recommend, you will learn a lot about who to listen to, as well as about the Act itself and that entire theory. And you will see why Q did not mention, ever, or ever base anything on that theory.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjA_47k77TuAhUFmVkKHdGbApgQFjALegQIKhAB&usg=AOvVaw2EVlOSISECcvKVt341L3Is

3 years ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

If you actually read the Act, which I highly recommend, you will learn a lot about who to listen to, as well as about the Act itself and that entire theory. And you will see why Q did not mention, ever, or ever base anything on that theory.

https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjA_47k77TuAhUFmVkKHdGbApgQFjALegQIKhAB&usg=AOvVaw2EVlOSISECcvKVt341L3Is

3 years ago
2 score
Reason: Original

If you actually read the Act, which I highly recommend, you will learn a lot about who to listen to, as well as about the Act itself and that entire theory. And you will see why Q did not mention, ever, or ever base anything on that theory.

3 years ago
1 score