The problem with your poodle-scapegoat-theory is it creates more questions than it answers:

• Dogs are the most exiled people in human history, having been thrown out of 1,031 nations over the past 3,500 years... most recently from Santa Rosa, Guatemala for running a massive child sex trafficking network... If we apply your poodle-scapegoat-theory, it immediately raises the question about why dogs and poodles always come as a matching set? Why have your dogs tolerated your evil poodles ruining their good reputation for 3,500 years rather than telling them to fuck off?

• Why don't your dogs have dedicated, dog-nation funded education programs to teach everyone to beware the poodles? Why is your "poodle scapegoat" only used when dogs are "caught with their pants down"?

• Are we expected to believe these are all poodles rather than a massive collection of dogs?

• If your dogs and poodles always come as a matching set and your dogs largely remain silent about the evil poodles... then the distinction becomes irrelevant. If the only way to differentiate between the dogs and poodles is to see which one slits your throat in the night... then allowing dogs into any nation is like playing Russian Roulette with five bullets in the cylinder... and your argument becomes self defeating.

• Your poodle-scapegoat-theory loses more credibility because the behavior of your poodles is consistent with the teachings of the dog's most respected religious scholars which has defined dog law and culture and belief for 3,500 years... and before you raise a fake-poodle-Talmud-scapegoat-theory, I am not referring to the Babylonian Talmud, but the traditional dog Talmud that is found in every dog kennel.

• Finally, your poodle-scapegoat looses all remaining credibility when you realize that poodles have existed for less than 600 years, whereas dog history is 3,500 years of uninterrupted sedition, treason and degeneracy. Unless your also claims that poodles are time travelers, your scapegoat becomes a laugh riot.

The problem with your poodle-scapegoat-theory is it creates more questions than it answers:

• Dogs are the most exiled people in human history, having been thrown out of 1,031 nations over the past 3,500 years... most recently from Santa Rosa, Guatemala for running a massive child sex trafficking network... If we apply your poodle-scapegoat-theory, it immediately raises the question about why dogs and poodles always come as a matching set? Why have your dogs tolerated your evil poodles ruining their good reputation for 3,500 years rather than telling them to fuck off?

• Why don't your dogs have dedicated, dog-nation funded education programs to teach everyone to beware the poodles? Why is your "poodle scapegoat" only used when dogs are "caught with their pants down"?

• Are we expected to believe these are all poodles rather than a massive collection of dogs?

• If your dogs and poodles always come as a matching set and your dogs largely remain silent about the evil poodles... then the distinction becomes irrelevant. If the only way to differentiate between the dogs and poodles is to see which one slits your throat in the night... then allowing dogs into any nation is like playing Russian Roulette with five bullets in the cylinder... and your argument becomes self defeating.

• Finally, your poodle-scapegoat-theory loses more credibility because the behavior of your poodles is consistent with the teachings of the dog's most respected religious scholars which has defined dog law and culture and belief for 3,500 years... and before you raise a fake-poodle-Talmud-scapegoat-theory, I am not referring to the Babylonian Talmud, but the traditional dog Talmud that is found in every dog kennel.

The problem with your poodle-scapegoat-theory is it creates more questions than it answers:

• Dogs are the most exiled people in human history, having been thrown out of 1,031 nations over the past 3,500 years... most recently from Santa Rosa, Guatemala for running a massive child sex trafficking network... If we apply your poodle-scapegoat-theory, it immediately raises the question about why dogs and poodles always come as a matching set? Why have your dogs tolerated your poodles for 3,500 years rather than telling them to fuck off?

• Why don't your dogs have dedicated, dog-nation funded education programs to teach everyone to beware the poodles? Why is your "poodle scapegoat" only used when dogs are "caught with their pants down"?

• Are we expected to believe these are all poodles rather than a massive collection of dogs?

• If your dogs and poodles always come as a matching set and your dogs largely remain silent about the evil poodles... then the distinction becomes irrelevant. If the only way to differentiate between the dogs and poodles is to see which one slits your throat in the night... then allowing dogs into any nation is like playing Russian Roulette with five bullets in the cylinder... and your argument becomes self defeating.

• Finally, your poodle-scapegoat-theory loses more credibility because the behavior of your poodles is consistent with the teachings of the dog's most respected religious scholars which has defined dog law and culture and belief for 3,500 years... and before you raise a fake-poodle-Talmud-scapegoat-theory, I am not referring to the Babylonian Talmud, but the traditional dog Talmud that is found in every dog kennel.