As for the evidence so far... lack of standing, too early, too late, etc..... Probably better to think about how bad the safeguards are in your electoral process. I'm assuming some of the complaints were also designed to fail, e.g. Sidney Powell's typo-riddled lawsuit.

Nov 3 was a sting operation. NSA/Q stopped previous 2016 steal, and allowed this steal to proceed as planned.

Credible source said ballots were marked with special watermark and with non radioactive isotopes meaning they could track each and every ballot remotely, and conclusively identify real vs fake ballots. Also, they were recording internet activity, and am sure they'll be able to clearly prove foreign interference here.

Probably most important, look at the declassifications Trump did in his final days.

I'm assuming we'll also see some damning related, but non-election evidence, that will align to the Durham report.

Additionally, if FB was coerced (and it was), do you think the Zuckerberg's election interference was a hindrance or needed by Q?

As for the evidence so far... lack of standing, too early, too late, etc..... Probably better to think about how bad the safeguards are in your electoral process. I'm assuming some of the complaints were also designed to fail, e.g. Sidney Powell's typo-riddled lawsuit.

Nov 3 was a sting operation. NSA/Q stopped previous 2016 steal, and allowed this steal to proceed as planned.

Credible source said ballots were marked with special watermark and with non radioactive isotopes meaning they could track each and every ballot remotely, and conclusively identify real vs fake ballots. Also, they were recording internet activity, and am sure they'll be able to clearly prove foreign interference here.

I'm assuming we'll also see some damning related, but non-election evidence, that will align to the Durham report.

Additionally, if FB was coerced (and it was), do you think the Zuckerberg's election interference was a hindrance or needed by Q?