President Trump or anyone in his administration, would not allow an illiterate writer, such as the one of the "form" above, represent his campaign. It's foolish to think otherwise.
Foolish? LOL It's foolish to challenge you to point to a single grammatical or spelling error in the document, or even a hint of unclear thinking or faulty sentence construction, because (a) there is none; and (b) you lack the requisite ability to recognize the fact. How did you manage to cram five errors into one sentence?
If you're gonna grammar-nazi, you should have brought the goods.
Instead, in your own message, you inexplicably separate the subject from the verb with a comma. The subject should read "Neither President Trump nor anyone in his administration". The verb should be "would allow". You use three commas where none are required. And you omit the essential "to" before represent.
(You also didn't notice that I just used "none" as singular in one paragraph and plural in another; and didn't know that that is grammatically defensible, or why. :)
Trust me, dude: You are unqualified to critique literacy. Whether this is real or not, it was not created by an illiterate writer. It's foolish to think otherwise.
President Trump or anyone in his administration, would not allow an illiterate writer, such as the one of the "form" above, represent his campaign. It's foolish to think otherwise.
Foolish? LOL It's foolish to challenge you to point to a single grammatical or spelling error in the document, or even a hint of unclear thinking or faulty sentence construction, because (a) there is none; and (b) you lack the requisite ability to recognize the fact.
If you're gonna grammar-nazi, you should have brought the goods.
Instead, in your own message, you inexplicably separate the subject (which should be "Neither President Trump nor anyone in his administration") from the verb (which should be "would allow") with a comma. You use three commas where none are required. And you omit the essential "to" before represent. You didn't notice that I just used "none" as singular in one paragraph and plural in another; and you didn't know that was grammatically defensible, or why.
Trust me, dude: You are unqualified to critique literacy. Whether this is real or not, it was not created by an illiterate writer. It's foolish to think otherwise.
President Trump or anyone in his administration, would not allow an illiterate writer, such as the one of the "form" above, represent his campaign. It's foolish to think otherwise.
Foolish? LOL It's foolish to challenge you to point to a single grammatical or spelling error in the document, or even a hint of unclear thinking or faulty sentence construction, because (a) there is none; and (b) you lack the requisite ability to recognize the fact.
If you're gonna grammar-nazi, you should have brought the goods.
Instead, in your own message, you inexplicably separate the subject (which should be "Neither President Trump nor anyone in his administration") from the verb (which should be "would allow") with a comma. You use three commas where none are required. And you omit the essential "to" before represent. You didn't notice that I just used "none" as singular in one paragraph and plural in another; and you didn't know that was grammatically defensible, or why.
Trust me, dude: You are unqualified to critique literacy. President Trump's campaign did not hire an illiterate writer. It's foolish to think otherwise.
President Trump or anyone in his administration, would not allow an illiterate writer, such as the one of the "form" above, represent his campaign. It's foolish to think otherwise.
Foolish? LOL It's foolish to challenge you to point to a single grammatical or spelling error in the document, or even a hint of unclear thinking or faulty sentence construction, because (a) there is none; and (b) you lack the requisite ability to recognize the fact.
If you're gonna grammar-nazi, you should have brought the goods.
Instead, in your own message, you inexplicably separate the subject (which should be "Neither President Trump nor anyone in his administration") from the verb (which should be "would allow") with a comma. You use three commas where none are required. And you omit the essential "to" before represent. You didn't notice that I just used "none" as singular in one paragraph and plural in another; and you didn't know that that was grammatical.
Trust me, dude: You are unqualified to critique literacy. It's foolish to think otherwise.
President Trump or anyone in his administration, would not allow an illiterate writer, such as the one of the "form" above, represent his campaign. It's foolish to think otherwise.
Foolish? LOL It's foolish to challenge you to point to a single grammatical or spelling error in the document, or even a hint of unclear thinking or faulty sentence construction, because (a) there is none; and (b) you lack the requisite ability to recognize the fact.
If you're gonna grammar-nazi, you should have brought the goods.
Instead, in your own message, you inexplicably separate the subject (which should have read "Neither President Trump nor anyone in his administration") from the verb with a comma. You use three commas where none are required. And you omit the essential "to" before represent.
Trust me, dude: You are unqualified to critique literacy. It's foolish to think otherwise.