I'm seriously confused how you came to this conclusion. What about being a graphic designer makes you think that this extremely low resolution image has video game models in it? Do you normally expect to see texture in a model that is blurred and only a few pixels in width?

So far, no one has actually offered an analysis when they claim photoshop on this image, which is pretty important. Saying "it looks like this" without offering any explanation doesn't carry any weight, even if you claim to be a graphic designer/expert/clergy/whatever.

Usually people spot photoshop by detecting inconsistencies in areas of the image compared to other areas. I am not seeing any inconsistency in this image when referencing the nooses with the rest of the image.

In fact, it appears that you can almost see through the ropes with the horizontal white support seemingly "cutting" through some of the ropes and not others.

Are you saying whoever photoshopped this purposefully cut out part of the models to simulate this optical illusion as well?

I would expect more of a thorough analysis on debunking a photoshop, which actually can be detected by professional photo forensics.

I'm seriously confused how you came to this conclusion. What about being a video game designer makes you think that this extremely low resolution image has video game models in it? Do you normally expect to see texture in a model that is blurred and only a few pixels in width?

Usually people spot photoshop by detecting inconsistencies in areas of the image compared to other areas. I am not seeing any inconsistency in this image when referencing the nooses with the rest of the image.

In fact, it appears that you can almost see through the ropes with the horizontal white support seemingly "cutting" through some of the ropes and not others.

Are you saying whoever photoshopped this purposefully cut out part of the models to simulate this optical illusion as well?