I consider myself to be an agnostic: a person who recognizes they are not wise enough to answer the question of whether or not there exists an "aware" creator of the universe, i.e. the jury is still deliberating.

As such I have belonged to groups with, and had many conversations with Atheists. Some believe they know the truth, and the truth is there is no creator. I have turned several of these people into Agnostics by the simple logic of how their beliefs are also not based on fact but on faith: their main complaint against the popular creator stories.

Most "Atheists" however are actually agnostic, with a slant very specifically against the tenants of Christianity (because its the most popular creator narrative in America). Their primary objections against these narratives are very logical conclusions against the stricter beliefs that don't pass muster against available evidence, they are not against the wisdom of the teachings.

I'm just putting that out there from the perspective of one who has been involved with those that call themselves "Atheist." That doesn't go against the OP. Atheism as a religion (those that fall into the first category above) could very well have been a Luciferian psy op.

I consider myself to be an agnostic: a person who recognizes they are not wise enough to answer the question of whether or not there exists an "aware" creator of the universe, i.e. the jury is still deliberating.

As such I have had many conversations with Atheists. Some believe they know the truth, and the truth is there is no creator. I have turned several of these people into Agnostics by the simple logic of how their beliefs are also not based on fact but on faith: their main complaint against the popular creator stories.

Most "Atheists" however are actually agnostic, with a slant very specifically against the tenants of Christianity (because its the most popular creator narrative in America). Their primary objections against these narratives are very logical conclusions against the stricter beliefs that don't pass muster against available evidence, they are not against the wisdom of the teachings.

I'm just putting that out there from the perspective of one who has been involved with those that call themselves "Atheist." That doesn't go against the OP. Atheism as a religion (those that fall into the first category above) could very well have been a Luciferian psy op.

I consider myself to be an agnostic: a person who recognizes they are not wise enough to answer the question of whether or not there exists a self-aware "creator" of the universe, i.e. the jury is still deliberating.

As such I have had many conversations with Atheists. Some believe they know the truth, and the truth is there is no creator. I have turned several of these people into Agnostics by the simple logic of how their beliefs are also not based on fact but on faith: their main complaint against the popular creator stories.

Most "Atheists" however are actually agnostic, with a slant very specifically against the tenants of Christianity (because its the most popular creator narrative in America). Their primary objections against these narratives are very logical conclusions against the stricter beliefs that don't pass muster against available evidence, they are not against the wisdom of the teachings.

I'm just putting that out there from the perspective of one who has been involved with those that call themselves "Atheist." That doesn't go against the OP. Atheism as a religion (those that fall into the first category above) could very well have been a Luciferian psy op.