Yet again they're meticulously skewing their propaganda to rub us up literally 'the wrong way'. Notice how we're all already poring over every key 'fact' throughout the full article (yes I've read and saved it), picking out what names, dates and deeds we can to hone in on and deem tangible 'evidence'. Whilst missing the real crime that the article repeats time and time again throughout it. That is, making brazen, emboldened, baseless allegations that Trump's entire 5 years (campaign + term) was striated top to bottom, start to finish with venality and subversion of 'democracy' at every turn. Call it slander, call it defamation, call it whatever legalese one wishes, or even be reductive and concede to just good old-fashioned innuendo and smear. But at some point along a chain of accountability, to just consistently state as fact that someone has done and or is doing something, without even a single breath of attempted evidential justification, is, oh what's the word, outright LIE, surely. Pretty easy to wriggle out of and backtrack on in print, not so much on the stand.

Yet again they're meticulously skewing their propaganda to rub us up literally 'the wrong way'.

Notice how we're all already poring over every key 'fact' throughout the full article (yes I've read and saved it), picking out what names, dates and deeds we can to hone in on and decry.

Whilst missing the real crime that the article repeats time and time again throughout it. That is, making brazen, emboldened, baseless allegations that Trump's entire 5 years (campaign + term) was striated top to bottom, start to finish with venality and subversion of 'democracy' at every turn.

Call it slander, call it defamation, call it whatever legalese one wishes, or even be reductive and concede to just good old-fashioned innuendo and smear. But at some point along a chain of accountability, to just consistently state as fact that someone has done and or is doing something, without even a single breath of attempted evidential justification, is, oh what's the word, outright LIE, surely. Pretty easy to wriggle out of and backtrack on in print, not so much on the stand.

Yet again they're meticulously skewing their propaganda to rub us up literally 'the wrong way'. Notice how we're all already poring over every key 'fact' throughout the full article (yes I've read and saved it), picking out what names, dates and deeds we can to hone in on and decry. Whilst missing the real crime that the article repeats time and time again throughout it. That is, making brazen, emboldened, baseless allegations that Trump's entire 5 years (campaign + term) was striated top to bottom, start to finish with venality and subversion of 'democracy' at every turn. Call it slander, call it defamation, call it whatever legalese one wishes, or even be reductive and concede to just good old-fashioned innuendo and smear. But at some point along a chain of accountability, to just consistently state as fact that someone has done and or is doing something, without even a single breath of attempted evidential justification, is, oh what's the word, outright LIE, surely. Pretty easy to wriggle out of and backtrack on in print, not so much on the stand.

Yet again they're meticulously skewing their propaganda to rub us up literally 'the wrong way'.

Notice how we're all already poring over every key 'fact' throughout the full article (yes I've read and saved it), picking out what names, dates and deeds we can to hone in on and decry.

Whilst missing the real crime that the article repeats time and time again throughout it. That is, making brazen, emboldened, baseless allegations that Trump's entire 5 years (campaign + term) was striated top to bottom, start to finish with venality and subversion of 'democracy' at every turn.

Call it slander, call it defamation, call it whatever legalese one wishes - but to just consistently state as fact that someone has done and or is doing something, without even a single breath of attempted evidential justification, is, oh what's the word, outright LIE, surely. Pretty easy to wriggle out of and backtrack on in print, but not so much on the stand.