This was on 8kun last night. What are everyone's thoughts on looking back if this could be true?

At the time it happened I thought Q was just referring to the one post when the trip got compromised...but the anon in the screen cap and what they wrote below is a compelling argument looking back.

If true, did Q let them do this or did they have a sleeper in their ranks and we would need to comb through those 1000 posts to see what should be thrown out or it just couldn't be possible and the anon below is wrong?

https://qposts.online/post/131 https://qposts.online/post/1834

https://qposts.online/post/132 https://qposts.online/post/1833

"There's almost 5000(*) posts. 1835 says some were compd.

It just so happens, all the stuff likezero risk of impeachmentandtrust sessionsand all the wrong stuff is in the posts Q said were compd.

That leaves over 3000 non-compd posts which don't have the wrong stuff

(*) the number is specific."

This was on 8kun last night. What are everyone's thoughts on looking back if this could be true?

At the time it happened I thought Q was just referring to the one post when the trip got compromised...but the anon in the screen cap and what they wrote below is a compelling argument looking back.

If true, did Q let them do this or did they have a sleeper in their ranks or it just couldn't be possible and the anon below is wrong?

"There's almost 5000(*) posts. 1835 says some were compd.

It just so happens, all the stuff likezero risk of impeachmentandtrust sessionsand all the wrong stuff is in the posts Q said were compd.

That leaves over 3000 non-compd posts which don't have the wrong stuff

(*) the number is specific."