Obviously you don't do it the way it's been done, which is inoculating throat swabs into Vero (African green monkey kidney) cells, mix it with other chemicals (viral transport medium- possibly unsterile introducing microbial contamination-, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs i.e. geneticin) in a petri dish and look for cytopathic effects, which could be caused by the chemicals themselves, then collecting the supernatant and sequence using PCR at 40 cycles or over (rendering it basically meaningless). There hasn't even been conclusive electron microscopy of the virus, just recognition of "characteristics" of coronaviruses. Even the primer sequence for the spike protein is a match for 93 human sequences and 91 sequences of various other microbes and fungi.
Regarding Koch's and Rivers, had the virus actually been isolated properly from an unadulterated sample from a diseased human, they could have been used to prove SARS-CoV was the infectious culprit, but conveniently the "ethics" of exposing people to a virus are cited, so epidemiology is used (even though informed consent would ameliorate ethics concerns) to bypass two of the critical steps.
Obviously without proper isolation and confirmation of infectiousness using Koch's/Rivers any claim to have developed gene therapy falsely called a "vaccine" that will only treat symptoms, not even confer immunity, is a complete scam.
Obviously you don't do it the way it's been done, which is inoculating throat swabs into Vero (African green monkey kidney) cells, mix it with other chemicals (viral transport medium- possibly unsterile introducing microbial contamination-, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs i.e. geneticin) in a petri dish and look for cytopathic effects, which could be caused by the chemicals themselves, then collecting the supernatant and sequence using PCR at 40 cycles or over (rendering it basically meaningless). There hasn't even been conclusive electron microscopy of the virus, just recognition of "characteristics" of coronaviruses.
Regarding Koch's and Rivers, had the virus actually been isolated properly from an unadulterated sample from a diseased human, they could have been used to prove SARS-CoV was the infectious culprit, but conveniently the "ethics" of exposing people to a virus are cited, so epidemiology is used (even though informed consent would ameliorate ethics concerns) to bypass two of the critical steps.
Obviously without proper isolation and confirmation of infectiousness using Koch's/Rivers any claim to have developed gene therapy falsely called a "vaccine" that will only treat symptoms, not even confer immunity, is a complete scam.
Even the primer sequence for the spike protein is a match for 93 human sequences and 91 sequences of various other microbes and fungus.
Obviously you don't do it the way it's been done, which is inoculating throat swabs into Vero (African green monkey kidney) cells, mix it with other chemicals (viral transport medium- possibly unsterile introducing microbial contamination-, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs i.e. geneticin) in a petri dish and look for cytopathic effects, which could be caused by the chemicals themselves, then collecting the supernatant and sequence using PCR at 40 cycles or over (rendering it basically meaningless). There hasn't even been conclusive electron microscopy of the virus, just recognition of "characteristics" of coronaviruses. Regarding Koch's and Rivers, had the virus actually been isolated properly from an unadulterated sample from a diseased human, they could have been used to prove SARS-CoV was the infectious culprit, but conveniently the "ethics" of exposing people to a virus are cited, so epidemiology is used (even though informed consent would ameliorate ethics concerns) to bypass two of the critical steps. Obviously without proper isolation and confirmation of infectiousness using Koch's/Rivers any claim to have developed gene therapy falsely called a "vaccine" that will only treat symptoms, not even confer immunity, is a complete scam. Even the primer sequence for the spike protein is a match for 93 human sequences and 91 sequences of various other microbes and fungus.
Obviously you don't do it the way it's been done, which is inoculating throat swabs into Vero (African green monkey kidney) cells, mix it with other chemicals (viral transport medium- possibly unsterile introducing microbial contamination-, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs i.e. geneticin) in a petri dish and look for cytopathic effects, which could be caused by the chemicals themselves, then collecting the supernatant and sequence using PCR at 40 cycles or over (rendering it basically meaningless). There hasn't even been conclusive electron microscopy of the virus, just recognition of "characteristics" of coronaviruses.
Regarding Koch's and Rivers, had the virus actually been isolated properly from an unadulterated sample from a diseased human, they could have been used to prove SARS-CoV was the infectious culprit, but conveniently the "ethics" of exposing people to a virus are cited, so epidemiology is used (even though informed consent would ameliorate ethics concerns) to bypass two of the critical steps.
Obviously without proper isolation and confirmation of infectiousness using Koch's/Rivers any claim to have developed gene therapy falsely called a "vaccine" that will only treat symptoms, not even confer immunity, is a complete scam.