I remember seeing GeorgeNews links pop up in qresearch at least a year ago, if not longer. It was clear they were marketing to the Q crowd, they would spam the board with an article and it would be followed by several hype-shills talking about how awesome it was that Georgenews revealed something...

And then you would click and it would take you to a fledgling site that seemed a little shady with a re-posted article from RT or something. Relevant information maybe, but not something they wrote themselves and yoi couldn't find elsewhere.

They seem to have come a long way since then. Thing is, I don't actually have a problem if someone wants to build a news aggregator for anons, like Drudge for digital soldiers or something...

But lately I have been thinking, when you call yourself "George" and now you post live locations at Trump Tower, you're doing something else! You aren't just a digital soldier in the cause helping to biild the new media, you are stringing people along with what is very likely well-played deception.

So at this point, they better be someone connected because they have certainly crossed the line of suggesting it.

I'm not going attack mode on GN yet just because it seems some important people have shared them lately. But I am monitoring them cautiously with a raised eyebrow.

I remember seeing GeorgeNews links pop up in qresearch at least a year ago, if not longer. It was clear they were marketing to the Q crowd, they would spam the board with an article and it would be followed by several hype-shills talking about how awesome it was that Georgenews revealed something...

And then you would click and it would take you to a fledgling site that seemed a little shady with a re-posted article from RT or something. Relevant information maybe, but not something they wrote themselves and yoi couldn't find elsewhere.

They seem to have come a long way since then. Thing is, I don't actually have a problem if someone wants to build a news aggregator for anons, like Drudge for digital soldiers or something...

But lately I have been thinking, when you call yourself "George" and now you post live locations at Trump Tower, you're doing something else! You aren't just a digital soldier in the cause helping to biild the new media, you are stringing people along with what is very likely well-played deception.

I'm not going attack mode on GN yet just because some important people have shared them lately. But I am monitoring them cautiously with a raised eyebrow.

I remember seeing GeorgeNews links pop up in qresearch at least a year ago, if not longer. It was clear they were marketing to the Q crowd, they would spam the board with an article and it would be followed by several hype-shills talking about how awesome it was that Georgenews revealed something...

And then you would click and it would take you to a fledgling site that seemed a little shady with a re-posted article from RT or something. Relevant information maybe, but not something they wrote themselves and yoi couldn't find elsewhere.

They seem to have come a long way since then. Thing is, I don't actually have a problem if someone wants to build a news aggregator for anons, like Drudge for digital soldiers or something...

But lately I have been thinking, when you call yourself "George" and now you post live locations at Trump Tower, you're doing something else! You aren't just a digital soldier in the cause helping to biild the new media, you are stringing people along with what is very likely well-played deception.

I'm not going full attack mode on GN yet just because some important people have shared them lately. But I am monitoring them cautiously with a raised eyebrow.