Best only to ask questions - Socratic method. Never answer them. ..

"So, Q is going after corruption and people who sell children for sex. If you are against Q, does that mean that you are in favor of child trafficking and having sex with children? How old should a baby be to have sex?" ..

When they squirm and get angry, "so if you are against all that, you must agree with Q, yes?" ..

More squirming. "You can't have it both ways. Are you are are you not in favor of pedophilia?" ..

I would avoid politics - it's too polarising. Stick to sex with children. There's no way that anyone can side with that. So they must be against it - which, logically, means they must agree with Q and with Trump. So Trump's executive order of Dec 21, 2017 is relevant since it deals with corruption and human trafficking. Have they read it? Why not? Don't you care about babies being sold for sex?

Keep circling this camp. Don't let them change the subject. Keep on questioning.

Best only to ask questions - Socratic method. Never answer them. ..

"So, Q is going after corruption and people who sell children for sex. If you are against Q, does that mean that you are in favor of child trafficking and having sex with children? How old should a baby be to have sex?" ..

When they squirm and get angry, "so if you are against all that, you must agree with Q, yes?" ..

More squirming. "You can't have it both ways. Are you are are you not in favor of pedophilia?" ..

I would avoid politics - it's too polarising. Stick to sex with children. There's no way that anyone can side with that. So they must be against it - which, logically, means they must agree with Q and with Trump. So Trump's executive order of Dec 21, 2017 is relevant since it deals with corruption and human trafficking. Have they read it? Why not? Don't you care about babies being sold for sex.

Keep circling this camp. Don't let them change the subject. Keep on questioning.

Best only to ask questions - Socratic method. Never answer them. ..

"So, Q is going after corruption and people who sell children for sex. If you are against Q, does that mean that you are in favor of child trafficking and having sex with children? How old should a baby be to have sex?" ..

When they squirm and get angry, "so if you are against all that, you must agree with Q, yes?" ..

More squirming. "You can't have it both ways. Are you are are you not in favor of pedophilia?" ..

I would avoid politics - it's too polarising. Stick to sex with children. There's no way that anyone can side with that. So they must be against it - which, logically, means they must agree with Q and with Trump. So Trump's executive order of Dec 21, 2017 is relevant since it deals with corruption and human trafficking. Have they read it? Why not? Don't you care about babies being sold for sex.

Keep circling this camp.

Best only to ask questions - Socratic method. Never answer them.

"So, Q is going after corruption and people who sell children for sex. If you are against Q, does that mean that you are in favor of child trafficking and having sex with children? How old should a baby be to have sex?"

When they squirm and get angry, "so if you are against all that, you must agree with Q, yes?"

More squirming. "You can't have it both ways. Are you are are you not in favor of pedophilia?"