I respect your points about George taking donations and having the ability to not take donations at all. It's good to have some perspective in return. Perhaps we are being deceived for our greenbacks and all. You make good points about George trying to imitate Q for the sake of the deception.

But your conduct, the way you're trying to convince us that we're grossly misled with a gleeful, holier-than-thou attitude, is not going to help you persuade others to your point of view. I found that rude and disgraceful, and had I not had my own misgivings about George I would have completely dissed your point of view.

As you might see from my recent posts I have posted about George, so you may be right in thinking that I'm just trying to push hopium from the direction of George. You would be only partly right. I post about George because I too am trying to figure out who this George figure actually is, because honestly I don't know. We don't know. Are they legit? Are they snake oil salesmen? Are they Q? Are they complete outsiders? In much the same way as we treat Q, we can't conclude who this individual is or what role they are playing unless we have more evidence and data. And that is why we post, to gather information, to vet that information, and to discuss.

Please drop the gleeful holier-than-thou attitude and show a bit more respect for your fellow pedes, who may or may not know what they are talking about. And in doing so, share what you think, what you suspect, and what you know, and be prepared to defend what you believe with some respect and decorum.

I respect your points about George taking donations and having the ability to not take donations at all. It's good to have some perspective in return. Perhaps we are being deceived for our greenbacks and all. You make good points about George trying to imitate Q for the sake of the deception.

But your conduct, the way you're trying to convince us that we're grossly misled with a gleeful, holier-than-thou attitude, is not going to help you persuade others to your point of view. I found that rude and disgraceful, and had I not had my own misgivings about George I would have completely dissed your point of view.

As you might see from my recent posts I have posted about George, so you may be right in thinking that I'm just trying to push hopium from the direction of George. You would be only partly right. I post about George because I too am trying to figure out who this George figure actually is, because honestly I don't know. We don't know. Are they legit? Are they snake oil salesmen? Are they Q? Are they complete outsiders? In much the same way as we treat Q, we can't conclude who this individual is or what role they are playing unless we have more evidence and data. And that is why we post, to gather information, to vet that information, and to discuss.

Please drop the gleeful holier-than-thou attitude and show a bit more respect for your fellow pedes, who may or may not know what they are talking about. And in doing so, share what you think, what you suspect, and what you know, and be prepared to defend what you think with some respect and decorum.

I respect your points about George taking donations and having the ability to not take donations at all. It's good to have some perspective in return. Perhaps we are being deceived for our greenbacks and all. You make good points about George trying to imitate Q for the sake of the deception.

But your conduct, the way you're trying to convince us that we're grossly misled with a gleeful, holier-than-thou attitude, is not going to help you persuade others to your point of view. I found that rude and disgraceful, and had I not had my own misgivings about George I would have completely dissed your point of view.

As you might see from my recent posts I have posted about George, so you may be right in thinking that I'm just trying to push hopium from the direction of George. You would be only partly right. I post about George because I too am trying to figure out who this George figure actually is, because honestly I don't know. We don't know. Are they legit? Are they snake oil salesmen? Are they Q? Are they complete outsiders? In much the same way as we treat Q, we can't conclude who this individual is or what role they are playing unless we have more evidence and data. And that is why we post, to gather information, to vet that information, and to discuss.

Please drop the gleeful holier-than-thou attitude and show a bit more respect for your fellow pedes, who may or may not know what they are talking about. And in doing so, share what you think, what you suspect, and what you know, and be prepared to defend what you think with respect.