Nope, they are just having a conference to hear some evidence and to see if it's worth their time. Just going by recent cases, I won't be surprised if it gets punted again! I hope the SCOTUS was just trying to look impartial and didn't want to think they were the cause of a civil war for blocking Xiden! There is court precedent in this county of a president being removed after supposedly winning an election might have been 1870 or something like that but it did happen.

Nope, they are just having a conference to hear some evidence and to see if it's worth their time. Just going by recent cases, I won't be surprised if it gets punted again! I hope the SCOTUS was just trying to look impartial and didn't want to think they were the cause of a civil war for blocking Xiden! There is a court precedent in this county of a president being removed after supposedly winning an election might have been 1870 or something like that but it did happen.

Nope, they are just having a conference to hear some evidence and to see if it's worth their time.