I've had an opportunity to review the report. Some of the facts on page 3 are mistaken (the security logs were, in fact, preserved), the "zeroing out" claim took place well after the data had been transferred to the state for tabulation, for example. In addition, the data largely revolves around local races (see the School Board races, pages 7-9), but Lin Wood has told us repeatedly that only the Presidential races were affected, and this had no bearing on the down-ballot races (which is why our Reps and Senators who got elected aren't challenging the election results in the same states Trump lost). Even if we were like "yeah they're totally 100% right" we're talking about maybe dozens of votes, not the thousands of fraudulent ballots that are being claimed. It doesn't add up. In short, this doesn't make sense. I keep trying to dig deeper into the whole "election was stolen" claim but whenever somebody links the "uncensored report" to me, it doesn't say what they say it does. What are you playing at here?

I've had an opportunity to review the report. Some of the facts on page 3 are mistaken (the security logs were, in fact, preserved), the "zeroing out" claim took place well after the data had been transferred to the state for tabulation, for example. In addition, the data largely revolves around local races (see the School Board races, pages 7-9, but Lin Wood has told us repeatedly that only the Presidential races were affected, and this had no bearing on the down-ballot races (which is why our Reps and Senators who got elected aren't challenging the election results in the same states Trump lost). Even if we were like "yeah they're totally 100% right" we're talking about maybe dozens of votes, not the thousands of fraudulent ballots that are being claimed. It doesn't add up.

In short, this doesn't make sense. I keep trying to dig deeper into the whole "election was stolen" claim but whenever somebody links the "uncensored report" to me, it doesn't say what they say it does.

What are you playing at here?