Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Here's why I respectfully disagree with your theory:

1: The use of the ">" symbol might not mean 'greater than' or 'better than'. It probably means 'next' or 'will lead to'. Most of the Q posts that use that symbol don't use it as 'greater than'.

2: According to Q post 36, Team Q was prepared to do the unthinkable (a military coup) if Hillary had won. That would be 10x more extreme than a flood in Feb/March this year. Very few people would've been red-pilled back then.

3: If corruption/swamp/pedo/satanic information is dripped slowly, the public will simply forget about it, just like Jeffrey Epstein. I think a flood is required to convince the masses. The #MeToo movement happened because of a flood, and alt-tech companies like Gab/Parler/Rumble/Bitchute grew exponentially because of a flood of Big Tech censorship. Most historical movements/transitions to a new system start slow and then end in a boom. Also, the downside of slowly dripping info is that the Cabal/Deep State has time to counteract it. Pedoflix can just release a "Cuties 2" movie to normalize the idea of pedophilia, for example.

3a: "Let Your Plans Be Dark, Fall Like A Thunderbolt." ~Sun Tzu, The Art of War

4: Tensions between Antifa/BLM vs. MAGA/Proud Boys will build up exponentially in just 1 year, let alone 4 years. The economy will become even more divided, with Republican pillows, Democrat banks, right wing toasters and left wing chairs. Q has been clear that no civil war will happen, and as little blood will be shed as possible.

But at the end of the day, I think Team Q will choose the best strategy and it'll be in our best interest. Taking down a satanic cabal that has been built up over centuries takes time. I'll be amazed if Team Q does it in 4 years, and impressed if it takes 8 years. I'm willing to be patient. I'm not screaming 'Are We There Yet?' every minute.

3 years ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

Here's why I respectfully disagree with your theory:

1: The use of the ">" symbol might not mean 'greater than' or 'better than'. It probably means 'next' or 'will lead to'. Most of the Q posts that use that symbol don't use it as 'greater than'.

2: According to Q post 36, Team Q was prepared to do the unthinkable (a military coup) if Hillary had won. That would be 10x more extreme than a flood in Feb/March this year. Very few people would've been red-pilled back then.

3: If corruption/swamp/pedo/satanic information is dripped slowly, the public will simply forget about it, just like Jeffrey Epstein. I think a flood is required to convince the masses. The #MeToo movement happened because of a flood, and alt-tech companies like Gab/Parler/Rumble/Bitchute grew exponentially because of a flood of Big Tech censorship. Most historical movements/transitions to a new system start slow and then end in a boom.

4: Tensions between Antifa/BLM vs. MAGA/Proud Boys will build up exponentially in just 1 year, let alone 4 years. The economy will become even more divided, with Republican pillows, Democrat banks, right wing toasters and left wing chairs. Q has been clear that no civil war will happen, and as little blood will be shed as possible.

But at the end of the day, I think Team Q will choose the best strategy and it'll be in our best interest. Taking down a satanic cabal that has been built up over centuries takes time. I'll be amazed if Team Q does it in 4 years, and impressed if it takes 8 years. I'm willing to be patient. I'm not screaming 'Are We There Yet?' every minute.

3 years ago
2 score
Reason: Original

Here's why I respectfully disagree with your theory:

1: The use of the ">" symbol might not mean 'greater than' or 'better than'. It probably means 'next' or 'will lead to'. Most of the Q posts that use that symbol don't use it as 'greater than'.

2: According to Q post 36, Team Q was prepared to do the unthinkable (a military coup) if Hillary had won. That would be 10x more extreme than a flood in Feb/March this year. Very few people would've been red-pilled back then.

3: If corruption/swamp/pedo/satanic information is dripped slowly, the public will simply forget about it, just like Jeffrey Epstein. I think a flood is required to convince the masses. The #MeToo movement happened because of a flood, and alt-tech companies like Gab/Parler/Rumble/Bitchute grew exponentially because of a flood of Big Tech censorship. Most historical movements/transitions to a new system start slow and then end in a boom.

4: Tensions between Antifa/BLM vs. MAGA/Proud Boys will build up exponentially in just 1 year, let alone 4 years. The economy will become even more divided, with Republican pillows, Democrat banks, right wing toasters and left wing chairs. Q has been clear that no civil war will happen, and as little blood will be shed as possible.

But at the end of the day, I think Team Q will choose the best strategy and it'll be in our best interest. Taking down a satanic cabal that has been built up over centuries takes time. I'll be amazed if Team Q does it in 4 years, and impressed if it takes 8 years.

3 years ago
1 score