There is no ‘according to the law’ if no judges are willing to hear the cases. Therefore there is no proving anything in those courts of law. There is zero risk of flight as we can hunt them down easily anywhere on the planet. The mistake was already made. This had to be headed off at the pass. People are losing their jobs and the deep freeze is going to make people’s bills go through the roof. Drop the hammer, or you are just as ambivalent as the rest of Congress. No it didn’t have to be this way. Not at all. If your premise is that Trump won 49 states there is not enough opposition to justify sitting on your hands...

There is no ‘according to the law’ if no judges are willing to hear the cases. Therefore there is no proving anything in those courts of law. There is zero risk of flight as we can hunt them down easily anywhere on the planet. The mistake was already made. This had to be headed off at the pass. People are losing their jobs and the deep freeze is going to make people’s bills go through the roof. Drop the hammer, or you are just as ambivalent as the rest of Congress. No it didn’t have to be this way. Not at all. If your premise is that Trump won all 49 states there is not enough opposition to justify sitting on your hands...