The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You'll of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited to this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square mile area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do your own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about it. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for another person to sign something and the Republic is restored? How much sense does that make? Use logic.
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Or will be obvious misinterpretations, such as citing laws having language stating that for purpose of law, the United States government includes where it is US government agency, where a US government corporation, where a Department of the US government, and one or two others as well. The Tennessee Valley Authority would be an example of a US Government corporation: there are many. No, that most certainly does not prove the claimed point nor does any law.
Quite likely I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of Voat for saying it, after being downvoted to oblivion. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited to this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square mile area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do your own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about it. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for another person to sign something and the Republic is restored? How much sense does that make? Use logic.
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Or will be obvious misinterpretations, such as citing laws having language stating that for purpose of law, the United States government includes where it is US government agency, where a US government corporation, where a Department of the US government, and one or two others as well. The Tennessee Valley Authority would be an example of a US Government corporation: there are many. No, that most certainly does not prove the claimed point nor does any law.
Quite likely I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of Voat for saying it, after being downvoted to oblivion. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited to this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square mile area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do your own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about it. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for another person to sign something and the Republic is restored? How much sense does that make? Use logic.
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Or will be obvious misinterpretations, such as citing laws having language stating that for purpose of law, the United States government includes where it is US government agency, where a US government corporation, where a Department of the US government, and one or two others as well. The Tennessee Valley Authority would be an example of a US Government corporation: there are many. No, that most certainly does not prove the claimed point nor does any law.
Quite likely I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it, after being downvoted to oblivion. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited to this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do your own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about it. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for another person to sign something and the Republic is restored? How much sense does that make? Use logic.
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Or will be obvious misinterpretations, such as citing laws having language stating that for purpose of law, the United States government includes where it is US government agency, where a US government corporation, where a Department of the US government, and one or two others as well. The Tennessee Valley Authority would be an example of a US Government corporation: there are many. No, that most certainly does not prove the claimed point nor does any law.
Quite likely I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it, after being downvoted to oblivion. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do your own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about it. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for another person to sign something and the Republic is restored? How much sense does that make? Use logic.
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Or will be obvious misinterpretations, such as citing laws having language stating that for purpose of law, the United States government includes where it is US government agency, where a US government corporation, where a Department of the US government, and one or two others as well. The Tennessee Valley Authority would be an example of a US Government corporation: there are many. No, that most certainly does not prove the claimed point nor does any law or judicial ruling I have ever seen cited.
Quite likely I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it (by Crensch), after being downvoted to oblivion. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do your own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about it. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for another person to sign something and the Republic is restored? How much sense does that make? Use logic.
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Or will be obvious misinterpretations, such as citing laws having language stating that for purpose of law, the United States government includes where it is US government agency, where a US government corporation, where a Department of the US government, and one or two others as well. The Tennessee Valley Authority would be an example of a US Government corporation: there are many. No, that most certainly does not prove the claimed point nor does any law or judicial ruling I have ever seen cited.
Quite likely I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it, after being downvoted to oblivion. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do your own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about it. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for another person to sign something and the Republic is restored? How much sense does that make? Use logic.
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Or will be obvious misinterpretations, such as citing laws having language stating that for purpose of law, the United States government includes where it is US government agency, where a US government corporation, where a Department of the US government, and one or two others as well. The Tennessee Valley Authority would be an example of a US Government corporation: there are many. No, that most certainly does not prove the claimed point nor does any law.
Quite likely I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it, after being downvoted to oblivion. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do your own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about it. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for another person to sign something and the Republic is restored? How much sense does that make? Use logic.
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Or will be obvious misinterpretations, such as citing laws having language stating that for purpose of law, the United States government includes where it is US government agency and where a US government corporation. The Tennessee Valley Authority would be an example of such: there are many. No, most certainly does not prove the claimed point.
Quite likely I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it, after being downvoted to oblivion. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do your own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about it. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for another person to sign something and the Republic is restored? How much sense does that make? Use logic.
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Quite likely I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it, after being downvoted to oblivion. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do your own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about it. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for another person to sign something and the Republic is restored? How much sense does that make? Use logic.
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy "US Corporation" thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Quite likely I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it, after being downvoted to oblivion. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do your own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for another person to sign something and the Republic is restored? How much sense does that make? Use logic.
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy "US Corporation" thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Quite likely I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it, after being downvoted to oblivion. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do you own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for another person to sign something and the Republic is restored? How much sense does that make? Use logic.
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy "US Corporation" thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Quite likely I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it, after being downvoted to oblivion. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do you own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for Trump to sign something and the Republic is restored?
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy "US Corporation" thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Quite likely I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it, after being downvoted to oblivion. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do you own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for Trump to sign something and the Republic is restored?
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go claiming "The US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President, Biden is president of nothing but a dissolved corporation!" You'll sound like a whacko. And if they take the time to go read the Act, you'll definitely appear utterly whacked. And that is the very idea of disinfo fed to us by controlled opposition. They give us some truth so we trust them, then they feed us utterly whacked stuff so we'll discredit ourselves and thus get nowhere when sharing real truth. Why listen to me about 9/11 or the stolen election etc when I just told you this objectively crazy "US Corporation" thing?
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Of course, I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do you own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Constitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for Trump to sign something and the Republic is restored?
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go talking about "US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President."
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Of course, I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do you own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Consitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for Trump to sign something and the Republic is restored?
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go talking about "US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President."
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Of course, I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.
The first thing to do is to read the Act that's generally cited to support this: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
You of course see that what it is is this: "That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes."
It states plainly that its venue is limited this specific small area.
You may read the entire thing and will find not a single thing other than setting up a local government for this quite limited 10 square area. It covers absolutely nothing about the rest of the United States. It is local government only.
Municipal corporations are not unusual setups for local governments.
Of course you may do you own analysis, but if you'd like opinions from people who go by actual evidence not just whether they love the narrative and damn the evidence:
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/1871-act-making-dc-a-corporation/
And stop and think about. How is it even plausible that all Congress has to do is pass an Act and the President sign it and the Consitution and Republic are overthrown just like that? And on top of that, all it takes is for Trump to sign something and the Republic is restored?
That is magical, evidence-free thinking. At best it is misinfo. Arguably it is disinfo to make us look like idiots to our normie friends and neighbors when we go talking about "US Corporation was dissolved and Trump is now the 19th President."
It can't be backed up. Every citation you ever see will be assertions that will completely not match up with law when you go read the law.
Of course, I will be downvoted for saying this. In fact I was thrown off of theawakening at Voat for saying it. However, there's the PDF of the Act you may read for yourself, and see if it is I that am telling the truth, or those who peddle this narrative.