Without the context of the rest of the original Bill Gates video, your quote likely means one of two things:

1. the "shape" could be the spike protein the mRNA is supposed to be the code for. The spike protein is the antigen (the shape) for the immunotherapy that is this misnamed "vaccine". I think this is what he means.
2. the "shape" could be referring to something else for which there is no context, and that is the fact that RNA folds up into specific shapes for various purposes. This is just normal molecular biology and by itself is not a reason for concern.

Again, with the whole video (which I'm pretty sure I've seen in the past, but don't recall the specifics of right now) I could tell you more.

The video then goes on to discuss CRISPR, which is a technology that can alter DNA. But it talks about it as a FUTURE technology. As I said, if we assume that the vaccine does not contain extra ingredients (like all the stuff required to make CRISPR work) then it cannot alter DNA.

Now, I am not suggesting we should just assume the vaccine contains exactly and only what it says it does. I wholeheartedly welcome testing to determine that. But unless there is some shred of evidence to support such an assertion, I am not going to indulge what is otherwise pure fantasy. There is more than enough evidence of REAL bad things. We don't need to make shit up as well, in fact, that way leads to ruin.

Without the context of the rest of the original Bill Gates video, your quote likely means one of two things:

1. the "shape" could be the spike protein the mRNA is supposed to be the code for. The antigen for the immunotherapy that is this misnamed "vaccine". I think this is what he means.
2. the "shape" could be referring to something else for which there is no context, and that is the fact that RNA folds up into specific shapes for various purposes. This is just normal molecular biology and by itself is not a reason for concern.

Again, with the whole video (which I'm pretty sure I've seen in the past, but don't recall the specifics of right now) I could tell you more.

The video then goes on to discuss CRISPR, which is a technology that can alter DNA. But it talks about it as a FUTURE technology. As I said, if we assume that the vaccine does not contain extra ingredients (like all the stuff required to make CRISPR work) then it cannot alter DNA.

Now, I am not suggesting we should just assume the vaccine contains exactly and only what it says it does. I wholeheartedly welcome testing to determine that. But unless there is some shred of evidence to support such an assertion, I am not going to indulge what is otherwise pure fantasy. There is more than enough evidence of REAL bad things. We don't need to make shit up as well, in fact, that way leads to ruin.

Without the context of the rest of the original Bill Gates video, your quote likely means one of two things:

1. the "shape" could be the spike protein the mRNA is supposed to be the code for. The antigen for the immunotherapy that is this misnamed "vaccine". While I think this may not be good for the purposes they are using it for, its not an alteration of the DNA.
2. the "shape" could be referring to something else for which there is no context, and that is the fact that RNA folds up into specific shapes for various purposes. This is just normal molecular biology and by itself is not a reason for concern.

Again, with the whole video (which I'm pretty sure I've seen in the past, but don't recall the specifics of right now) I could tell you more.

The video then goes on to discuss CRISPR, which is a technology that can alter DNA. But it talks about it as a FUTURE technology. As I said, if we assume that the vaccine does not contain extra ingredients (like all the stuff required to make CRISPR work) then it cannot alter DNA.

Now, I am not suggesting we should just assume the vaccine contains exactly and only what it says it does. I wholeheartedly welcome testing to determine that. But unless there is some shred of evidence to support such an assertion, I am not going to indulge what is otherwise pure fantasy. There is more than enough evidence of REAL bad things. We don't need to make shit up as well, in fact, that way leads to ruin.

Without the context of the rest of the video, your quote likely means one of two things:

1. the "shape" could be the spike protein the mRNA is supposed to be the code for. While I think this may not be good for the purposes they are using it for, its not an alteration of the DNA.
2. the "shape" could be referring to something else for which there is no context, and that is the fact that RNA folds up into specific shapes for various purposes. This is just normal molecular biology and by itself is not a reason for concern.

Again, with the whole video (which I'm pretty sure I've seen in the past, but don't recall the specifics of right now) I could tell you more.

The video then goes on to discuss CRISPR, which is a technology that can alter DNA. But it talks about it as a FUTURE technology. As I said, if we assume that the vaccine does not contain extra ingredients (like all the stuff required to make CRISPR work) then it cannot alter DNA.

Now, I am not suggesting we should just assume the vaccine contains exactly and only what it says it does. I wholeheartedly welcome testing to determine that. But unless there is some shred of evidence to support such an assertion, I am not going to indulge what is otherwise pure fantasy. There is more than enough evidence of REAL bad things. We don't need to make shit up as well, in fact, that way leads to ruin.