In other words you have no evidence, and don't consider evidence at all necessary to promoting a claim.

And on your idea that a heroin/methadone analogy could prove any point, you appear unaware that they are different drugs with different chemical structure and which act differently for that reason, so the analogy is false.

Try naming a drug that addicts go into withdrawal if they can only get the pure.

You can't of course.

It is evidence-free to claim that anyone goes into adrenochrome withdrawal, and given that adrenochrome is readily available pure, is one of the weakest evidence-free distractions (disinfo) ever put out.

In other words you have no evidence, and don't consider evidence at all necessary to promoting a claim.

And on your idea that a heroin/methadone analogy could prove any point, you appear unaware that they are different drugs with different chemical structure and which act differently for that reason, so the analogy is false.

Try naming a drug that addicts go into withdrawal if they can only get the pure, or even, prefer the less pure to the pure.

You can't of course.

In other words you have no evidence, and don't consider evidence at all necessary to promoting a claim.

And on your idea that a heroin/methadone analogy proves a point, you appear unaware that they are different drugs with different chemical structure, so the analogy is false.

Try naming a drug that addicts go into withdrawal if they can only get the pure, or even, prefer the less pure to the pure.

You can't of course.

In other words you have no evidence of any kind, and don't consider evidence at all necessary to promoting a claim.