Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Conclusion from the first article:

"The mRNA-1273 vaccine induced anti–SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in all participants, and no trial-limiting safety concerns were identified. These findings support further development of this vaccine."

For the second article:

This was a 2012 trial and is not the same vaccine that is being distributed now. There have been multiple changes since then. The early tests are what stoked fears and are the reason that misinformation still exists among groups like this board.

Unfortunately, as you're aware, this board is also an echo chamber. Everyone here automatically agrees with each other, because they all espouse the same fears/anxieties/views. All I would suggest is to speak with someone outside of this board that you trust as a medical professional, but is not associated with this board's group-think.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Conclusion from the first article:

"The mRNA-1273 vaccine induced anti–SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in all participants, and no trial-limiting safety concerns were identified. These findings support further development of this vaccine."

For the second article:

This was a 2012 trial and is not the same vaccine that is being distributed now. There have been multiple changes since then. The early tests are what stoked fears and are the reason that misinformation still exists among groups like this board.

Unfortunately, as you're aware, this board is also an echo chamber. Everyone here automatically agrees with each other, because they all espouse the same views. All I would suggest is to speak with someone outside of this board that you trust as a medical professional (someone not associated with this board's group-think).

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Conclusion from the first article:

"The mRNA-1273 vaccine induced anti–SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in all participants, and no trial-limiting safety concerns were identified. These findings support further development of this vaccine."

For the second article:

This was a 2012 trial and is not the same vaccine that is being distributed now. There have been multiple changes since then. The early tests are what stoked fears and are the reason that misinformation still exists among groups like this board.

Unfortunately, as you're aware, this board is also an echo chamber. Everyone here automatically agrees with each other, because they all espouse the same views. All I would suggest is to speak with someone outside of this board that you trust as a medical professional, but is not associated with this board's group-think.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Conclusion from the first article:

"The mRNA-1273 vaccine induced anti–SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in all participants, and no trial-limiting safety concerns were identified. These findings support further development of this vaccine."

For the second article:

This was a 2012 trial and is not the same vaccine that is being distributed now. There have been multiple changes since then. The early tests are what stoked fears and are the reason that misinformation still exists among groups like this board.

Unfortunately, as you're aware, this board is also an echo chamber. All I would suggest is to speak with someone outside of this board that you trust as a medical professional.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Conclusion from the first article:

"The mRNA-1273 vaccine induced anti–SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in all participants, and no trial-limiting safety concerns were identified. These findings support further development of this vaccine."

For the second article:

This was a 2012 trial and is not the same vaccine that is being distributed now. There have been multiple changes since then. The early tests are what stoked fears and are the reason that misinformation still exists among groups like this board.

Unfortunately, as you're aware, this board is an echo chamber and I'm probably wasting my time. All I would suggest is to speak with someone outside of this board that you trust as a medical professional.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Conclusion from the first article:

"The mRNA-1273 vaccine induced anti–SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in all participants, and no trial-limiting safety concerns were identified. These findings support further development of this vaccine."

For the second article:

This was a 2012 trial and is not the same vaccine that is being distributed now. There have been multiple changes since then. The early tests are what stoked fears and are the reason that misinformation still exists among groups like this board.

3 years ago
1 score