If you’re saying that Scavino’s message was:
A) Nicholas Winton was complicit in human trafficking and (civilian) “rescuers” have actually often themselves been predators,
and NOT:
B) (Clandestine military) rescuers are currently saving children from their satanic predators’ underground tunnels (which is how most people on this thread seem to be interpreting his tweet)
…then you have a perfectly valid interpretation, and one worth discussing. Is that what you’re trying to say?
The post’s title, BTW, works for either interpretation.
If you’re saying that Scavino’s tweet was meant to suggest:
A) Nicholas Winton was complicit in human trafficking and (civilian) “rescuers” have actually often themselves been predators,
and NOT:
B) (Clandestine military) rescuers are currently saving children from their satanic predators’ underground tunnels (which is how most people on this thread seem to be interpreting his tweet)
…then you have a perfectly valid interpretation, and one worth discussing. Is that what you’re trying to say?
The post’s title, BTW, works for either interpretation.
If you’re saying that Scavino’s tweet was meant to suggest:
A) Nicholas Winton was possibly complicit in human trafficking and that (civilian) “rescuers” have actually often themselves been predators,
and NOT:
B) (Clandestine military) rescuers are currently saving children from their satanic predators’ underground tunnels (which is how most people on this thread seem to be interpreting his tweet)
…then you have a perfectly valid interpretation, and one worth discussing. Is that what you’re trying to say?
The post’s title, BTW, works for either interpretation.
If you’re saying that Scavino’s tweet was meant to suggest:
A) Nicholas Winton was possibly complicit in human trafficking and that (civilian) “rescuers” have actually often themselves been predators,
and NOT:
B) (Clandestine military) rescuers are currently saving children from their satanic predators’ underground tunnels (which is how most people on this thread seem to be interpreting his tweet)
…you’d have a perfectly valid interpretation, and one worth discussing. Is that what you’re trying to say?
The post’s title, BTW, works for either interpretation.
If you’re saying that Scavino’s tweet was meant to suggest:
A) Nicholas Winton was possibly complicit in human trafficking and that (civilian) “rescuers” have actually often themselves been predators,
and NOT:
B) (Clandestine military) rescuers are currently saving children from their satanic predators’ underground tunnels (which is how most people on this thread seem to be interpreting his tweet)
…you have a perfectly valid interpretation, and one worth discussing. Is that what you’re trying to say?
The post’s title, BTW, works for either interpretation.
If you’re saying that Scavino’s tweet was meant to suggest that:
A) Nicholas Winton was complicit in human trafficking and that (civilian) “rescuers” have actually often themselves been predators,
and NOT that:
B) (Clandestine military) rescuers are currently saving children from their satanic predators’ underground tunnels (which is how most people on this thread seem to be interpreting his tweet)
…that’s a perfectly valid interpretation, and worth discussing. Is that what you’re trying to say?
The post’s title, BTW, works for either interpretation.