I'm a scientist. I've been asking people for a couple decades to show me good evidence it isn't bogus.

The only piece of real science I have seen to support it is a very mild warming trend over a couple decades. The warming trend seen is the same type of warming trend that has been seen thousands of times in geological records, and we are no where near numerous past peaks in temperature. In fact compared to geological records we are in a relatively cool period.

Other than that I have seen tens, maybe a hundred climate models that have failed prediction by a stupendous amount. Every single one has been so miraculously bad at predicting trends its as if they were trying really hard to make bad models.

I used to think they got a bunch of real scientists together and asked them all to make April Fools climate model. Then someone stole those fake models and started publishing them one by one as a LARP, but everyone took them seriously instead.

That was before I realized the whole thing was a DS PsyOp for control and money.

@OP: My advice is to ask them for a piece of real science that supports the theories. Ask them for a single predictive climate model that has lived up to its predictions. The main problem with their thinking is, you can't prove something doesn't exist. The burden of proof is on the person who says it does.

I'm a scientist. I've been asking people for a couple decades to show me good evidence it isn't bogus.

The only piece of real science I have seen to support it is a very mild warming trend over a couple decades. The warming trend seen is the same type of warming trend that has been seen thousands of times in geological records, and we are no where near numerous past peaks in temperature. In fact compared to geological records we are in a relatively cool period.

Other than that I have seen tens, maybe a hundred climate models that have failed prediction by a stupendous amount. Every single one has been so miraculously bad at predicting trends its as if they were trying really hard to make bad models.

I used to think they got a bunch of real scientists together and asked them all to make April Fools climate model. Then someone stole those fake models and started publishing them one by one as a LARP, but everyone took them seriously instead.

That was before I realized the whole thing was a DS PsyOp for control and money.

@OP: My advice is to ask them for a piece of real science that supports the theories. Ask them for a single predictive climate model that has lived up to its predictions. The main problem with their thinking is, you can't prove something doesn't exist. The burden of proof is on the person who says it does.

I'm a scientist. I've been asking people for a couple decades to show me good evidence it isn't bogus.

The only piece of real science I have seen to support it is a very mild warming trend over a couple decades. The warming trend seen is the same type of warming trend that has been seen thousands of times in geological records, and we are no where near numerous past peaks in temperature. In fact compared to geological records we are in a relatively cool period.

Other than that I have seen tens, maybe a hundred climate models that have failed prediction by a stupendous amount. Every single one has been so miraculously bad at predicting trends its as if they were trying really hard to make bad models.

I used to think they got a bunch of real scientists together and asked them all to make April Fools climate model. Then someone stole those fake models and started publishing them one by one as a LARP, but everyone took them seriously instead.

That was before I realized the whole thing was a DS PsyOp for control and money.

@OP: My advice is to ask them for a piece of real science that supports the theories. Ask them for a single predictive climate model that has lived up to its predictions. The main problem with their thinking is, you can't prove something doesn't exist. The burden of proof is on the person who says it does.

I'm a scientist. I've been asking people for a couple decades to show me good evidence it isn't bogus. The only piece of real science I have seen to support it is a very mild warming trend over a couple decades. The warming trend seen is the same type of warming trend that has been seen thousands of times in geological records, and we are no where near numerous past peaks in temperature. In fact compared to geological records we are in a relatively cool period. Other than that I have seen tens, maybe a hundred climate models that have failed prediction by a stupendous amount. Every single one has been so miraculously bad at predicting trends its as if they were trying really hard to make bad models. I used to think they got a bunch of real scientists together and asked them all to make April Fools climate model. Then someone stole those fake models and started publishing them one by one as a LARP, but everyone took them seriously instead. That was before I realized the whole thing was a DS PsyOp for control and money. @OP: My advice is to ask them for a piece of real science that supports the theories. Ask them for a single predictive climate model that has lived up to its predictions. The main problem with their thinking is, you can't prove something doesn't exist. The burden of proof is on the person who says it does.

I'm a scientist. I've been asking people for a couple decades to show me good evidence it isn't bogus.

The only piece of real science I have seen to support it is a very mild warming trend over a couple decades. The warming trend seen is the same type of warming trend that has been seen thousands of times in geological records, and we are no where near numerous past peaks in temperature. In fact compared to geological records we are in a relatively cool period.

Other than that I have seen tens, maybe a hundred climate models that have failed prediction by a stupendous amount. Every single one has been so miraculously bad at predicting trends its as if they were trying really hard to make bad models.

I used to think they got a bunch of real scientists together and asked them all to make April Fools climate model. Then someone stole those fake models and started publishing them one by one as a LARP, but everyone took them seriously instead.

That was before I realized the whole thing was a DS PsyOp for control and money.

@OP: My advice is to ask them for a piece of real science that supports the theories. Ask them for a single predictive climate model that has lived up to its predictions.