Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal position is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing some evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise and time: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune
Incidentally, the story claiming that the zero-evidence single payoff supposedly of $7 million exceeded his existing net worth does not line up with his at least somewhat-evidenced net worth being much more than that. That supports the story being not only unevidenced, but fake entirely and a careless one at that.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal position is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise, here is some: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune
Incidentally, the story claiming that the zero-evidence single payoff supposedly of $7 million exceeded his existing net worth does not line up with his at least somewhat-evidenced net worth being much more than that. That supports the story being not only unevidenced, but fake entirely and a careless one at that.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal position is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise, here is some: https://justrichest.com/william-barr-biography-worth-family-facts/ , https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune
Incidentally, the story claiming that the zero-evidence single payoff supposedly of $7 million exceeded his existing net worth does not line up with his at least somewhat-evidenced net worth being much more than that. That supports the story being not only unevidenced, but fake entirely and a careless fake at that.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal position is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise, here is some: https://justrichest.com/william-barr-biography-worth-family-facts/ , https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune
Incidentally, the story claiming that the zero-evidence single payoff supposedly of $7 million exceeded his existing net worth does not line up with his at least somewhat-evidenced net worth being much more than that. That supports the story being not only unevidenced, but fake entirely and a careless one at that.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal position is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise, here is some: https://justrichest.com/william-barr-biography-worth-family-facts/ , https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune
Incidentally, the story claiming that the zero-evidence single payoff supposedly of $7 million exceeded his existing net worth does not line up with his at least somewhat-evidenced net worth being much more than that. That supports the story being not only unevidenced, but fake entirely, and a careless fake at that.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal position is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise, here is some: https://justrichest.com/william-barr-biography-worth-family-facts/ , https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune
Incidentally, the story claiming that the zero-evidence single payoff supposedly of $7 million exceeded his existing net worth does not line up with his at least somewhat-evidenced net worth being much more than that. That supports the story being not only unevidenced, but fake entirely.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal position is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise, here is some: https://justrichest.com/william-barr-biography-worth-family-facts/ , https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune
Incidentally, the story claiming the zero-evidence single payoff supposedly of $7 million exceeded his existing net worth does not line up with his at least somewhat-evidenced net worth being much more than that. That supports the story being not only unevidenced, but fake entirely.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal thinking is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise, here is some: https://justrichest.com/william-barr-biography-worth-family-facts/ , https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune
Incidentally, the story claiming the zero-evidence single payoff supposedly of $7 million exceeded his existing net worth does not line up with his at least somewhat-evidenced net worth being much more than that. That supports the story being not only unevidenced, but fake entirely and not even a careful fake.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal thinking is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise, here is some: https://justrichest.com/william-barr-biography-worth-family-facts/ , https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune
Incidentally, the story claiming the zero-evidence single payoff supposedly of $7 million exceeded his existing net worth does not line up with his at least somewhat-evidenced net worth being much more than that. That supports the story being not only unevidenced, but fake entirely.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal thinking is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise, here is some: https://justrichest.com/william-barr-biography-worth-family-facts/ , https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune
Incidentally, the story claiming the zero-evidence single payoff supposedly of $7 million was several times his existing net worth does not line up with his at least somewhat-evidence net worth being much more than that. That supports the story being not only unevidenced, but fake entirely.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal thinking is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise, here is some: https://justrichest.com/william-barr-biography-worth-family-facts/ , https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal thinking is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Btw, if wishing evidence on the giant sums Barr has been paid allegedly simply for legal expertise, here is some: https://justrichest.com/william-barr-biography-worth-family-facts/ , https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/07/19/how-attorney-general-bill-barr-built-a-40-million-fortune/?sh=1e13efd04f3a
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed something.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal thinking is worth what he was paid between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed someting.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal thinking is worth what he has been paid.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed someting.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal thinking is worth what he was paid while between government stints.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed someting.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Has Barr acted before in the Deep State's interests? Of course, consider his protecting the murderous FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Is Barr quite wealthy already? That's a fact, and he probably got that way more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion. I don't seriously think any legal thinking is worth what he has been paid.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.
Note the complete lack of sources. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere here except that somebody typed someting.
Barr crooked? Most likely! Barr very wealthy already, that's a fact, and probably more as payoffs than genuinely earned, as opinion.
My point is not to say Barr is honest, but to bring out the fact that the cited claim here has zero evidence, and it is necessary to keep track of when things have zero evidence versus when there actually is evidence.