Your approach can be discredited.

If the report, as you say, is legitimate. Then everything must be taken as legitimate within. So, it was a response to strikes by militia groups over a month ago that killed Americans. Biden is in charge. Nothing more to be said. It is 100% pure and legitimate, everything reported on.

Most here believe the Orange Man is in charge and as do I. Nobody here is interested in proving to you why that is. You can find out yourself, the choice is yours.

Your approach is treating this report like a salad bar, where you take the pieces from it that you like and leave the rest. To you, the report is legit, it confirms Biden is in charge but the reason for the strike is disregarded and instead transposed to give your theory that it means a restart of corrupt monetarily driven wars weight when nothing of the sort was reported on in the report that you claimed legitimate.

You're now wasting peoples time.

Your approach can be discredited.

If the report, as you say, is legitimate. Then everything must be taken as legitimate within. So, it was a response to strikes by militia groups over a month ago that killed Americans. Biden is in charge. Nothing more to be said. It is 100% pure and legitimate, everything reported on.

Most here believe the Orange Man is in charge and as do I. Nobody here is interested in proving to you why that is. You can find out yourself, the choice is yours.

Your approach is treating this report like a salad bar, where you take the pieces from it that you like and leave the rest. To you, the report is legit, it confirms Biden is in charge but the reason for the strike is disregarded and instead transposed to give your theory that it means a restart of corrupt monetarily driven wars weight when nothing of the sort was reported on in the report that claimed legitimate.

You're now wasting peoples time.