Even if he was ....He certainly was not a direct decedent. And that supposition at best is speculative and circumstantial. Also, the so called circumstantial evidence of Austrian proofs, are coming out of a commie hat.
Consider the Haavra contract and it's success. Who benefited? And who opposed it?
You would want to read this little gem: https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/agreement-concerning-allocations-to-german-jews-emigrating-to-palestine
With this in mind, what was the actual objective of this official policy? What was it meant to create?
The whole idea that it was a semitic vs germanic issue is laughable, once you start digging into the nitty gritty. (rather: khazarian vs germanic)
Then move to the wider policies put in place concerning the way people lived in Germany. And when considering the international complexity of solving the consequences of The Versailles Peace Treaty, till 1937/1938 it was quite easy to solve until Poland changed it's tune in 38/39.
Note that Poland kicked bolshevik ass in the twenties, when the Soviets invaded Poland in the 20-ties. So, what was the actual reason of their anti German stance on the issue of German lands under Polish administration?
It reminds me of the Right wing in Sweden. The Social democrats have not imposed any measures to "combat" coronavirus, yet the right wing is screaming for lockdowns, mask mandates, mandatory vaccination, etc forcing a political reality while the elections in Sweden are approaching. At the same time, when looking into The Netherlands, you see D66, those are the social liberals, VVD, the traditional liberals, CU, Christian union, CDA christian democrats, Green party and Socialists party all on the same level: mandatory vaccins, mask mandates, curfew, in all: totalitarianism and fuck human rights, while the right (FvD, Libertarians, PVV and VSN are vehemently opposed)
You are better than simply elevating speculation based on appearances to the level of certainty.
When it comes to Q, Q makes a small remark: a subgroup. And this should peek our interests.
N does not refer to Nazi. The continued Nazi ideology is relevant. Events will clarify. Think subgroup. Q
Continued NAZI ideology? or National Socialist ideology? What is NAZI-ideology? Who came up with it? What subgroup?
Even if he was ....He certainly was not a direct decedent. And that supposition at best is speculative and circumstantial. Also, the so called circumstantial evidence of Austrian proofs, are coming out of a commie hat.
Consider the Haavra contract and it's success. Who benefited? And who opposed it?
You would want to read this little gem: https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/agreement-concerning-allocations-to-german-jews-emigrating-to-palestine
With this in mind, what was the actual objective of this official policy? What was it meant to create?
The whole idea that it was a semitic vs germanic issue is laughable, once you start digging into the nitty gritty. (rather: khazarian vs germanic)
Then move to the wider policies put in place concerning the way people lived in Germany. And when considering the international complexity of solving the consequences of The Versailles Peace Treaty, till 1937/1938 it was quite easy to solve until Poland changed it's tune in 38/39.
Note that Poland kicked bolshevik ass in the twenties, when the Soviets invaded Poland in the 20-ties. So, what was the actual reason of their anti German stance on the issue of German lands under Polish administration?
It reminds me of the Right wing in Sweden. The Social democrats have not imposed any measures to "combat" coronavirus, yet the right wing is screaming for lockdowns, mask mandates, mandatory vaccination, etc forcing a political reality while the elections in Sweden are approaching. At the same time, when looking into The Netherlands, you see D66, those are the social liberals, VVD, the traditional liberals, CU, Christian union, CDA christian democrats, Green party and Socialists party all on the same level: mandatory vaccins, mask mandates, curfew, in all: totalitarianism and fuck human rights, while the right (FvD, Libertarians, PVV and VSN are vehemently opposed)
You are better than simply elevating speculation based on appearances to the level of certainty.
When it comes to Q, Q makes a small remark: a subgroup. And this would peek our interests.