Was that just a shoutout to Q, nothing but coincidence, or is there a com in there/by there we should be looking for?

Logical thinking (often promoted, in those words, by Q) says:

Trump could have picked ANY number from zero upward to list RINOS

When making a point in a major speech of this type, it's very common to support it with 1, 2, or 3 examples (humans tend to prefer or remember stories [beginning, middle, end] and other things in threes when possible for some reason...it forms the basic structure for a huge percentage of joke stories too...an X, a Y, and a Z walk into a bar...or my favorite: Guy finds lamp, rubs it, genie pops out, says you get three wishes, BUT whatever you wish for, your worst enemy gets double...guy says 1st wish, a dozen beautiful women; 2nd, two extra inches of length; 3rd wish is...wait for it......for ONE of my testicles to disappear :).

Hope at least one of you guys laughed. Point being, three is common. In a major speech, you don't typically stand there and read off long, boring lists of things without a real purpose. Because by the time you get to seven or eight, people are already forgetting what the first few were.

That he got all the way up past 10 IMHO is really remarkable in the context of an extremely major speech to potentially hundreds of millions of viewers around the world.

That he stopped at exactly 17 is beyond any credible suggestion of mere coincidence. Why not keep going to 20, 25 or beyond? We all know there must be more than just 17 RINOs to call out!

The Occam's Razor conclusion is that Trump is using the number 17, REPEATEDLY, as a means of communicating to followers that yes, Q is still a thing, the operation is still ongoing, don't despair. Same meaning behind his choice of number of flags on the stage for his farewell address in Colorado. Could have chosen literally any number of flags from 1 to 50.

Was that just a shoutout to Q, nothing but coincidence, or is there a com in there/by there we should be looking for?

Logical thinking (often promoted, in those words, by Q) says:

Trump could have picked ANY number from zero upward to list RINOS

When making a point in a major speech of this type, it's very common to support it with 1, 2, or 3 examples (humans tend to prefer or remember stories [beginning, middle, end] and other things in threes when possible for some reason...it forms the basic structure for a huge percentage of joke stories too...an X, a Y, and a Z walk into a bar...or my favorite: Guy finds lamp, rubs it, genie pops out, says I'll give you three wishes, BUT whatever you wish for, your worst enemy gets double...guy says 1st wish, a dozen beautiful women; 2nd, two extra inches of length; 3rd wish is...wait for it......for ONE of my testicles to disappear :).

Hope at least one of you guys laughed. Point being, three is common. In a major speech, you don't typically stand there and read off long, boring lists of things without a real purpose. Because by the time you get to seven or eight, people are already forgetting what the first few were.

That he got all the way up past 10 IMHO is really remarkable in the context of an extremely major speech to potentially hundreds of millions of viewers around the world.

That he stopped at exactly 17 is beyond any credible suggestion of mere coincidence. Why not keep going to 20, 25 or beyond? We all know there must be more than just 17 RINOs to call out!

The Occam's Razor conclusion is that Trump is using the number 17, REPEATEDLY, as a means of communicating to followers that yes, Q is still a thing, the operation is still ongoing, don't despair. Same meaning behind his choice of number of flags on the stage for his farewell address in Colorado. Could have chosen literally any number of flags from 1 to 50.

Was that just a shoutout to Q, nothing but coincidence, or is there a com in there/by there we should be looking for?

The first and third options are equivalent.

Logical thinking (often promoted, in those words, by Q) says:

Trump could have picked ANY number from zero upward to list RINOS

When making a point in a major speech of this type, it's very common to support it with 1, 2, or 3 examples (humans tend to prefer or remember stories [beginning, middle, end] and other things in threes when possible for some reason...it forms the basic structure for a huge percentage of joke stories too...an X, a Y, and a Z walk into a bar...or my favorite: Guy finds lamp, rubs it, genie pops out, says I'll give you three wishes, BUT whatever you wish for, your worst enemy gets double...guy says 1st wish, a dozen beautiful women; 2nd, two extra inches of length; 3rd wish is...wait for it......for ONE of my testicles to disappear :).

Hope at least one of you guys laughed. Point being, three is common. In a major speech, you don't typically stand there and read off long, boring lists of things without a real purpose. Because by the time you get to seven or eight, people are already forgetting what the first few were.

That he got all the way up past 10 IMHO is really remarkable in the context of an extremely major speech to potentially hundreds of millions of viewers around the world.

That he stopped at exactly 17 is beyond any credible suggestion of mere coincidence. Why not keep going to 20, 25 or beyond? We all know there must be more than just 17 RINOs to call out!

The Occam's Razor conclusion is that Trump is using the number 17, REPEATEDLY, as a means of communicating to followers that yes, Q is still a thing, the operation is still ongoing, don't despair. Same meaning behind his choice of number of flags on the stage for his farewell address in Colorado. Could have chosen literally any number of flags from 1 to 50.

Was that just a shoutout to Q, nothing but coincidence, or is there a com in there/by there we should be looking for?

The first and third options are equivalent.

Logical thinking (often promoted, in those words, by Q) says:

Trump could have picked ANY number from zero upward to list RINOS

When making a point in a major speech of this type, it's very common to support it with 1, 2, or 3 examples (humans tend to prefer or remember stories [beginning, middle, end] and other things in threes when possible for some reason...it forms the basic structure for a huge percentage of joke stories too...an X, a Y, and a Z walk into a bar...or my favorite: Guy finds lamp, rubs it, genie pops out, says I'll give you three wishes, BUT whatever you wish for, your worst enemy gets double...guy says 1st wish, a dozen beautiful women; 2nd, two extra inches of manhood; 3rd wish is...wait for it......for ONE of my testicles to disappear :).

Hope at least one of you guys laughed. Point being, three is common. In a major speech, you don't typically stand there and read off long, boring lists of things without a purpose. By the time you get to seven or eight, people are already forgetting what the first few were.

That he got all the way up past 15 is really remarkable in the context of an extremely major, internationally televised speech to potentially hundreds of millions of viewers. That he stopped at exactly 17 is beyond any credible suggestion of mere coincidence. Why not keep going to 20, 25 or beyond? There must be more than just 17 RINOs to call out!

The Occam's Razor conclusion is that Trump is using the number 17, REPEATEDLY, as a means of communicating to followers that yes, Q is still a thing, the operation is still ongoing, don't despair. Same meaning behind his choice of number of flags on the stage for his farewell address in Colorado. Could have chosen literally any number of flags from 1 to 50.