I 100% think the dates coincide & something will happen, but I actually believe it is a red herring to draw the deep state into blowing their last shot in trying to prevent whitehats from doing whatever they have planned for that date. Then they will think they won, act more obviously tyrannical in their crazed state of relieved euphoria and make us believe we lost along with jarring the rest of the sleeping awake to the danger they are in. As they act like unopposed dictators who believe they have the upper hand & cannot be stopped, the military goes "Syke!" and swoops in with their actual Trump card shortly after.
I am convinced, but others don't seem to see it quite like I do & just throw me the goalposts comment. I try to explain some of why I get this here, but there's been a lot more than I've noticed that I haven't been able to break down in word form since there's so much of it & a good portion is ambiguously connected.
Here's a slice: [https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRj8uN63/x/c/4Dx6DNzaLii]
I just can't figure out whether the real Trump card is a 1-yr delta or 3-yr. Pompeo recently put out a tweet where the timestamp matched up with a Q Drop that simply said "1_yr". I can't tell if that means the plan is fast forwarding to the real plan outlined somewhere in 1 year deltas, or if the 1 year deltas are the red herring being activated.
Just don't be disappointed if March 4 comes and goes with nothing happening or even very bad news happening, because I think that is 99% part of the plan.
If you're wondering why they would risk letting the tyranny push so far, it's because the more obvious & tangible the tyranny (most of us here are intuitive thinkers who can extrapolate much farther ahead than the majority of the population without necessarily needing to see the effects here & now), the more normies wake up to it. And the more overwhelming the majority of people agree that military action is necessary, the more understood the actions/plan will be & the more successful the restored republic will be in the long and short term outcomes.
Look at Myanmar. That was a test. What percentage of the public were in support of the military stepping in with redoing elections? 93%? (I forget the exact number, but it was high.) How successful will the special elections be at that percentage? (If Myanmar was a test, then we may not even know the results of the test til the end of the year, which means Q plan is likely planned to take effect later.) Now apply to US. How many people do you think would actually support the military stepping in right now as things are? Not just upset or appalled with what's going on, but acknowledging, enthusiastically or grudgingly, that somebody the USA can trust to protect them with brute force needs to step in. Probably not 93%. But maybe 75%. Not enough to avoid significant resistance that would cause widespread or uncontrollable collateral damage & threaten the success of the plan. Q needs to wait to for that percentage to be pushed higher in order to be able to safely manage the outcome.
I 100% think the dates coincide & something will happen, but I actually believe it is a red herring to draw the deep state into blowing their last shot in trying to prevent whitehats from doing whatever they have planned for that date. Then they will think they won, act more obviously tyrannical in their crazed state of relieved euphoria and make us believe we lost along with jarring the rest of the sleeping awake to the danger they are in. As they act like unopposed dictators who believe they have the upper hand & cannot be stopped, the military goes "Syke!" and swoops in with their actual Trump card shortly after.
I am convinced, but others don't seem to see it quite like I do & just throw me the goalposts comment. I try to explain some of why I get this here, but there's been a lot more than I've noticed that I haven't been able to break down in word form since there's so much of it & a good portion is ambiguously connected.
Here's a slice: [will edit with link shortly]
I just can't figure out whether the real Trump card is a 1-yr delta or 3-yr. Pompeo recently put out a tweet where the timestamp matched up with a Q Drop that simply said "1_yr". I can't tell if that means the plan is fast forwarding to the real plan outlined somewhere in 1 year deltas, or if the 1 year deltas are the red herring being activated.
Just don't be disappointed if March 4 comes and goes with nothing happening or even very bad news happening, because I think that is 99% part of the plan.
If you're wondering why they would risk letting the tyranny push so far, it's because the more obvious & tangible the tyranny (most of us here are intuitive thinkers who can extrapolate much farther ahead than the majority of the population without necessarily needing to see the effects here & now), the more normies wake up to it. And the more overwhelming the majority of people agree that military action is necessary, the more understood the actions/plan will be & the more successful the restored republic will be in the long and short term outcomes.
Look at Myanmar. That was a test. What percentage of the public were in support of the military stepping in with redoing elections? 93%? (I forget the exact number, but it was high.) How successful will the special elections be at that percentage? (If Myanmar was a test, then we may not even know the results of the test til the end of the year, which means Q plan is likely planned to take effect later.) Now apply to US. How many people do you think would actually support the military stepping in right now as things are? Not just upset or appalled with what's going on, but acknowledging, enthusiastically or grudgingly, that somebody the USA can trust to protect them with brute force needs to step in. Probably not 93%. But maybe 75%. Not enough to avoid significant resistance that would cause widespread or uncontrollable collateral damage & threaten the success of the plan. Q needs to wait to for that percentage to be pushed higher in order to be able to safely manage the outcome.