Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I do not believe any of the Malthus/Soylent Green/Limits to Growth theories apply to our civilization, especially once the cabal is gone. Malthus's overpopulation predictions are accurate in ancient civilizations without fossil fuels, advanced healthcare, or electronics. But his theories have failed miserably over the past 200 years. Every single time food production was a problem, new technologies were invented to squeeze the most output out of every acre. The authors of Limits to Growth made predictions that mineral deposits would run out and their prices would soar. But prices of those resources are actually lower today than in the 1980's.

World population will already flatten out at 8-9 billion people and slowly decline from there. The only issue is consumption per person, which, again, will be supported once the cabal's grip over the economy is gone and innovation is allowed to prosper.

Does the cabal want to flood us with illegal immigrants in order to gain Democrat votes and weaken our sense of unity? Of course! But this has nothing to do with natural resources.

Your viewpoint makes perfect sense for the pre-industrial era, but not for the 21st century in my opinion. Trust me, I came across Limits to Growth 4 years ago and thought the peak of civilization would be around 2020. Of course that would happen if the cabal were in charge. But if Team Q is in charge, it won't happen.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I do not believe any of the Malthus/Soylent Green/Limits to Growth theories apply to our civilization, especially once the cabal is gone. Malthus's overpopulation predictions are accurate in ancient civilizations without fossil fuels, advanced healthcare, or electronics. But his theories have failed miserably over the past 200 years. Every single time food production was a problem, new technologies were invented to squeeze the most output out of every acre. The authors of Limits to Growth made predictions that mineral deposits would run out and their prices would soar. But prices of those resources are actually lower today than in the 1980's.

World population will already flatten out at 8-9 billion people and slowly decline from there. The only issue is consumption per person, which, again, will be fixed once the cabal's grip over the economy is gone.

Does the cabal want to flood us with illegal immigrants in order to gain Democrat votes and weaken our sense of unity? Of course! But this has nothing to do with natural resources.

Your viewpoint makes perfect sense for the pre-industrial era, but not for the 21st century in my opinion. Trust me, I came across Limits to Growth 4 years ago and thought the peak of civilization would be around 2020. Of course that would happen if the cabal were in charge. But if Team Q is in charge, it won't happen.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I do not believe any of the Malthus/Soylent Green/Limits to Growth theories apply to our civilization, especially once the cabal is gone. Malthus's overpopulation predictions are accurate in ancient civilizations without fossil fuels, advanced healthcare, or electronics. But his theories have failed miserably over the past 200 years. Every single time food production was a problem, new technologies were invented to squeeze the most output out of every acre. The authors of Limits to Growth made predictions that mineral deposits would run out and their prices would soar. But prices of those resources are actually lower today than in the 1980's.

World population will already flatten out at 8-9 billion people and slowly decline from there. The only issue is consumption per person, which, again, will be fixed once the cabal's grip over the economy is gone.

Does the cabal want to flood us with illegal immigrants in order to gain Democrat votes and weaken our sense of unity? Of course! But this has nothing to do with natural resources.

Your viewpoint makes perfect sense for the pre-industrial era, but not for the 21st century in my opinion.

3 years ago
1 score