How do you explain George News cutting Evspra because they asked about the dvidshub.net media they were using to make them look legit?

George may have banned because they got caught and wanted to silence. Or it could be because Evspra asked a question that looks an awful lot like a shill attack. I'm not saying it was, but it could conceivably be taken as such.

I myself (and several others) are banned just because we asked them to address dvidshub.net.

When one person asks a question that looks like a shill attack, and then more follow up, it looks like an outside attack from a GROUP of shills.

Instead of saying something like "yea those are not original videos sorry for being misleading" or something along those lines or addressing it they shut off comments and haven't said anything about it. Oh wait I'm sorry they did say something to the effect of "You will regret doubting us".

I do not justify my behavior to shills, do you?

Someone correct me if I'm worng.

I'm not saying you are wrong. I am only saying I do not believe you are right. There is a big distinction between the two. The evidence that has been provided against George.news is compelling, but not sufficient to meet the standards of any court of law. Much more important than that though, even if they are Paytriots (or worse) there is still no reason to threaten bans for linking to their posts as we have been doing for a couple months.

Such acts of totalitarianism and censorship cause me to be more wary of Evspra than George.news.

How do you explain George News cutting Evspra because they asked about the dvidshub.net media they were using to make them look legit?

George may have banned because they got caught and wanted to silence. Or it could be because Evspra asked a question that looks an awful lot like a shill attack. I'm not saying it was, but it could conceivably be taken as such.

I myself (and several others) are banned just because we asked them to address dvidshub.net.

When one person asks a question that looks like a shill attack, and then more follow up, it looks like an outside attack from a GROUP of shills.

Instead of saying something like "yea those are not original videos sorry for being misleading" or something along those lines or addressing it they shut off comments and haven't said anything about it. Oh wait I'm sorry they did say something to the effect of "You will regret doubting us".

I do not justify my behavior to shills, do you?

Someone correct me if I'm worng.

I'm not saying you are wrong. I am only saying I do not believe you are right. There is a big distinction between the two. The evidence that has been provided against George.news is compelling, but not sufficient to meet the standards of any court of law. Much more important than that though, even if they are Paytriots (or worse) there is still no reason to threaten bans for linking to their posts as we have been doing for a couple months.

Such acts of totalitarianism and censorship cause me to be more wary of Evspra than George.news.

How do you explain George News cutting Evspra because they asked about the dvidshub.net media they were using to make them look legit?

George may have banned because they got caught and wanted to silence. Or it could be because Evspra asked a question that looks an awful lot like a shill attack. I'm not saying it was, but it could conceivably be taken as such.

I myself (and several others) are banned just because we asked them to address dvidshub.net.

When one person asks a question that looks like a shill attack, and then more follow up, it looks like an outside attack from a GROUP of shills.

Instead of saying something like "yea those are not original videos sorry for being misleading" or something along those lines or addressing it they shut off comments and haven't said anything about it. Oh wait I'm sorry they did say something to the effect of "You will regret doubting us".

I do not justify my behavior to shills, do you?

Someone correct me if I'm worng.

I'm not saying you are wrong. I am only saying I do not believe you are right. There is a big distinction between the two. The evidence that has been provided against George.news is compelling, but not sufficient to meet the standards of any court of law. Much more important than that though, even if they are Paytriots (or worse) there is still no reason to threaten bans for linking to their posts as we have been doing for a couple months.

Such acts of totalitarianism and censorship cause me to be more wary of Evspra than George.news.

How do you explain George News cutting Evspra because they asked about the dvidshub.net media they were using to make them look legit?

George may have banned because they got caught and wanted to silence. Or it could be because Evspra asked a question that looks an awful lot like a shill attack. I'm not saying it was, but it could conceivably be taken as such.

I myself (and several others) are banned just because we asked them to address dvidshub.net.

When one person asks a question that looks like a shill attack, and then more follow up, it looks like an outside attack from a GROUP of shills.

Instead of saying something like "yea those are not original videos sorry for being misleading" or something along those lines or addressing it they shut off comments and haven't said anything about it. Oh wait I'm sorry they did say something to the effect of "You will regret doubting us".

I do not justify my behavior to shills, do you?

Someone correct me if I'm worng.

I'm not saying you are wrong. I am only saying I do not believe you are right. There is a big distinction between the two. The evidence that has been provided against George.news is compelling, but not sufficient to meet the standards of any court of law. Much more important than that though, even if they are Paytriots (or worse) there is still no reason to threaten bans for linking to their posts as we have been doing for a couple months.

Such acts of totalitarianism and censorship cause me to be more wary of Evspra than George.news.

How do you explain George News cutting Evspra because they asked about the dvidshub.net media they were using to make them look legit?

George may have banned because they got caught and wanted to silence. Or it could be because Evspra asked a question that looks an awful lot like a shill attack. I'm not saying it was, but it could conceivably be taken as such.

I myself (and several others) are banned just because we asked them to address dvidshub.net.

When one person asks a question that looks like a shill attack, and then more follow up, it looks like an outside attack from a GROUP of shills.

Instead of saying something like "yea those are not original videos sorry for being misleading" or something along those lines or addressing it they shut off comments and haven't said anything about it. Oh wait I'm sorry they did say something to the effect of "You will regret doubting us".

I do not justify my behavior to shills, do you?

Someone correct me if I'm worng.

I'm not saying you are wrong. I am only saying I do not believe you are right. There is a big distinction between the two. The evidence that has been provided against George.news is compelling, but not sufficient to meet the standards of any court of law. Much more important than that though, even if they are Paytriots (or worse) there is still no reason to threaten bans for linking to their posts as we have been doing for a couple months.

Such acts of totalitarianism and censorship cause me to be more wary of Evspra than George.news.

How do you explain George News cutting Evspra because they asked about the dvidshub.net media they were using to make them look legit?

George may have banned because they got caught. Or it could be because Evspra asked a question that looks an awful lot like a shill attack. I'm not saying it was, but it could conceivably be taken as such.

I myself (and several others) are banned just because we asked them to address dvidshub.net.

When one person asks a question that looks like a shill attack, and then more follow up, it looks like an outside attack from a GROUP of shills.

Instead of saying something like "yea those are not original videos sorry for being misleading" or something along those lines or addressing it they shut off comments and haven't said anything about it. Oh wait I'm sorry they did say something to the effect of "You will regret doubting us".

I do not justify my behavior to shills, do you?

Someone correct me if I'm worng.

I'm not saying you are wrong. I am only saying I do not believe you are right. There is a big distinction between the two. The evidence that has been provided against George.news is compelling, but not sufficient to meet the standards of any court of law. Much more important than that though, even if they are Paytriots (or worse) there is still no reason to threaten bans for linking to their posts as we have been doing for a couple months.

Such acts of totalitarianism and censorship cause me to be more wary of Evspra than George.news.

How do you explain George News cutting Evspra because they asked about the dvidshub.net media they were using to make them look legit?

George may have banned because they got caught. It could be because Evspra asked a question that looks an awful lot like a shill attack. I'm not saying it was, but it could conceivably be taken as such.

I myself (and several others) are banned just because we asked them to address dvidshub.net.

When one person asks a question that looks like a shill attack, and then more follow up, it looks like an outside attack from a GROUP of shills.

Instead of saying something like "yea those are not original videos sorry for being misleading" or something along those lines or addressing it they shut off comments and haven't said anything about it. Oh wait I'm sorry they did say something to the effect of "You will regret doubting us".

I do not justify my behavior to shills, do you?

Someone correct me if I'm worng.

I'm not saying you are wrong. I am only saying I do not believe you are right. There is a big distinction between the two. The evidence that has been provided against George.news is compelling, but not sufficient to meet the standards of any court of law. Much more important than that though, even if they are Paytriots (or worse) there is still no reason to threaten bans for linking to their posts as we have been doing for a couple months.

Such acts of totalitarianism and censorship cause me to be more wary of Evspra than George.news.

How do you explain George News cutting Evspra because they asked about the dvidshub.net media they were using to make them look legit?

George may have banned because they got caught. It could be because Evspra asked a question that looks an awful lot like a shill attack. I'm not saying it was, but it could conceivably be taken as such.

I myself (and several others) are banned just because we asked them to address dvidshub.net.

When one person asks a question that looks like a shill attack, and then more follow up, it looks like an outside attack from a GROUP of shills.

Instead of saying something like "yea those are not original videos sorry for being misleading" or something along those lines or addressing it they shut off comments and haven't said anything about it. Oh wait I'm sorry they did say something to the effect of "You will regret doubting us".

I do not justify my behavior to shills, do you?

Someone correct me if I'm worng.

I'm not saying you are wrong. I am only saying I do not believe you are right. There is a big distinction between the two. The evidence that has been provided against George.news is compelling, but not sufficient to meet the standards of any court of law. Much more important than that though, even if they are Paytriots (or worse) there is still no reason to threaten bans for linking to their posts as we have been doing for a couple months.

Such acts of totalitarianism and censorship cause me to be warry of Evspra more than George.news.