Thank you for this comment! Truly! It reminds me why this board is a unique and profound place.

Not just for the passages, but also for your commentary. A second look, and a second interpretation on the topic, is very much appreciated.

NOW, in response:

I think your take works out logically, I think your take works out theologically. However, it is a LOT to digest. And I don't mean that the biblical prophecy is hard to digest. Taken literally or figuratively, the Bible is a profound work of art.

What is difficult for me, as its always been, is Donald Trump. Even within the context of Q/TGA (the phenomenon, not this site), Donald Trump begs our scrutiny. I think that ANY person in the public narrative, and especially one who not only espouses his own sanctity but is adored by the masses, is worthy of the harshest critique. It seems he's a far cry from the demon-esq characterization hurled at him by his political adversaries, but he's still a business mogul who profited immensely off the most decadent stages of capitalism and the global subjugation of humanity. He's still a reality tv star who has clearly thrived off fame. His life and his education still sit firmly within reference to the mystery religions/illuminati/cabal (i.e. freemasonry, jesuits (georgetown), etc.).

Trump as frontman and bulletproof shield to the media for military masterminds I can take. But Trump as destroyer of evil? Trump as transcendental force for transcendental good? Perhaps. But it's hard not to sober up on him from time to time. Sure, the likelihood that opposing forces have existed for all time within the mystery religions/brotherhood of the snake/freemasons/jesuits is high I'd say. But he is without doubt somewhere in their club, and their club is difference than ours. In sympathy for those who can't quite get on board with the Don, I have to admit that I get it. My lifes experience has culminated in an abject disdain for TV personality + fame. And that intuition hardly feels illogical.

Could he be a test? A trial of sorts? Sure. But if he is a sign for folks to get their chickens in order before show-time, he is a difficult test, and one that many rational, well intentioned, and good hearted people will fail.

The vaccine endorsement has me questioning his role, and perhaps the role of Q. Careful discernment, which has admirably always been advocated for by Q, should lead each of us to steep skepticism of any character in play, from Lin Wood (who's almost too clean to be true) to Donald Trump.

Again, thank you for your response! I hope we can continue this thoughtful discussion.

Thank you for this comment! Truly! It reminds me why this board is a unique and profound place.

Not just for the passages, but also for your commentary. A second look, and a second interpretation on the topic, is very much appreciated.

NOW, in response:

I think your take works out logically, I think your take works out theologically. However, it is a LOT to digest. And I don't mean that the biblical prophecy is hard to digest. Taken literally or figuratively, the Bible is a profound work of art.

What is difficult for me, as its always been, is Donald Trump. Even within the context of Q/TGA (the phenomenon, not this site), Donald Trump begs our scrutiny. I think that ANY person in the public narrative, and especially one who not only espouses his own sanctity but is adored by the masses, is worthy of the harshest critique. It seems he's a far cry from the demon-esq characterization hurled at him by his political adversaries, but he's still a business mogul who profited immensely off the most decadent stages of capitalism and the global subjugation of humanity. He's still a reality tv star who has clearly thrived off fame. His life and his education still sit firmly within reference to the mystery religions/illuminati/cabal (i.e. freemasonry, jesuits (georgetown), etc.).

Trump as frontman and bulletproof shield to the media for military masterminds I can take. But Trump as destroyer of evil? Trump as transcendental force for transcendental good? Perhaps. But it's hard not to sober up on him from time to time. Sure, the likelihood that opposing forces have existed for all time within the mystery religions/brotherhood of the snake/freemasons/jesuits is high I'd say. But he is without doubt somewhere in their club, and their club is difference than ours. In sympathy for those who can't quite get on board with the Don, I have to admit that I get it. My lifes experience has culminated in an abject disdain for TV personality + fame. And that intuition hardly feels illogical.

Could he be a test? A trial of sorts? Sure. But if he is a sign for folks to get their chickens in order before show-time, he is a difficult test, and one that many rational, well intentioned, and good hearted people will fail.

The vaccine endorsement has me questioning his role, and perhaps the role of Q. Careful discernment, which has admirably always been advocated for by Q, should lead each of us to steep skepticism of any character in play, from Lin Wood (who's almost too clean to be true) to Donald Trump.

Thank you for this comment! Truly! It reminds me why this board is a unique and profound place.

Not just for the passages, but also for your commentary. A second look, and a second interpretation on the topic, is very much appreciated.

NOW, in response:

I think your take works out logically, I think your take works out theologically. However, it is a LOT to digest. And I don't mean that the biblical prophecy is hard to digest. Taken literally or figuratively, the Bible is a profound work of art.

What is difficult for me, as its always been, is Donald Trump. Even within the context of Q/TGA (the phenomenon, not this site), Donald Trump begs our scrutiny. I think that ANY person in the public narrative, and especially one who not only espouses his own sanctity but is adored by the masses, is worthy of the harshest critique. It seems he's a far cry from the demon-esq characterization hurled at him by his political adversaries, but he's still a business mogul who profited immensely off the most decadent stages of capitalism and the global subjugation of humanity. He's still a reality tv star who has clearly thrived off fame. His life and his education still sit firmly within reference to the mystery religions/illuminati/cabal (i.e. freemasonry, jesuits (georgetown), etc.).

Trump as frontman and bulletproof shield to the media for military masterminds I can take. But Trump as destroyer of evil? Trump as transcendental force for transcendental good? Perhaps. But it's hard not to sober up on him from time to time. Sure, the likelihood that opposing forces have existed for all time within the mystery religions/brotherhood of the snake/freemasons/jesuits is high I'd say. But he is without doubt somewhere in their club, and their club is difference than ours. In sympathy for those who can't quite get on board with the Don, I have to admit that I get it. My lifes experience has culminated in an abject disdain for TV personality + fame. And that intuition hardly feels illogical.

Could he be a test? A trial of sorts? Sure. But if he is a sign for folks to get their chickens in order before show-time, he is a difficult test, and one that many rational, well intentioned, and good hearted people will fail.

The vaccine endorsement has me questioning his role, and perhaps the role of Q. Careful discernment, which has admirably always been advocated for by Q, should lead any of us to steep skepticism of any character in play, from Lin Wood (who I deeply admire) to Donald Trump.

Thank you for this comment! Truly! It reminds me why this board is a unique and profound place.

Not just for the passages, but also for your commentary. A second look, and a second interpretation on the topic, is very much appreciated.

NOW, in response:

I think your take works out logically, I think your take works out theologically. However, it is a LOT to digest. And I don't mean that the biblical prophecy is hard to digest. Taken literally or figuratively, the Bible is a profound work of art.

What is difficult for me, as its always been, is Donald Trump. Even within the context of Q/TGA (the phenomenon, not this site), Donald Trump begs our scrutiny. I think that ANY person in the public narrative, and especially one who not only espouses his own sanctity but is adored by the masses, is worthy of the harshest critique. It seems he's a far cry from the demon-esq characterization hurled at him by his political adversaries, but he's still a business mogul who profited immensely off the most decadent stages of capitalism and the global subjugation of humanity. He's still a reality tv star who has clearly thrived off fame. His life and his education still sit firmly within reference to the mystery religions/illuminati/cabal (i.e. freemasonry, jesuits (georgetown), etc.).

Trump as frontman and bulletproof shield to the media for military masterminds I can take. But Trump as destroyer of evil? Trump as transcendental force for transcendental good? Perhaps. But it's hard not to sober up on him from time to time. Sure, the likelihood that opposing forces have existed for all time within the mystery religions/brotherhood of the snake/freemasons/jesuits is high I'd say. But he is without doubt somewhere in their club, and their club is difference than ours. In sympathy for those who can't quite get on board with the Don, I have to admit that I get it. My lifes experience has culminated in an abject disdain for TV personality + fame. And that intuition hardly feels illogical.

Could he be a test? A trial of sorts? Sure. But if he is a sign for folks to get their chickens in order before show-time, he is a difficult test, and one that many rational, well intentioned, and good hearted people will fail.

The vaccine endorsement has me questioning his role, and perhaps the role of Q. I think skepticism and discernment are healthy, but they should lead any of us to steep skepticism of any character in play, from Lin Wood (who seems almost squeaky clean) to Donald Trump.

Thank you for this comment! Truly! It reminds me why this board is a unique and profound place.

Not just for the passages, but also for your commentary. A second look, and a second interpretation on the topic, is very much appreciated.

NOW, in response:

I think your take works out logically, I think your take works out theologically. However, it is a LOT to digest. And I don't mean that the biblical prophecy is hard to digest. Taken literally or figuratively, the Bible is a profound work of art.

What is difficult for me, as its always been, is Donald Trump. Even within the context of Q/TGA (the phenomenon, not this site), Donald Trump begs our scrutiny. I think that ANY person in the public narrative, and especially one who not only espouses his own sanctity but is adored by the masses, is worthy of the harshest critique. It seems he's a far cry from the demon-esq characterization hurled at him by his political adversaries, but he's still a business mogul who profited immensely off the most decadent stages of capitalism and the global subjugation of humanity. He's still a reality tv star who has clearly thrived off fame. His life and his education still sit firmly within reference to the mystery religions/illuminati/cabal (i.e. freemasonry, jesuits (georgetown), etc.).

Trump as frontman and bulletproof shield to the media for military masterminds I can take. But Trump as destroyer of evil? Trump as transcendental force for transcendental good? Perhaps. But it's hard not to sober up on him from time to time. Sure, the likelihood that opposing forces have existed for all time within the mystery religions/brotherhood of the snake/freemasons/jesuits is high I'd say. But he is without doubt somewhere in their club, and their club is difference than ours. In sympathy for those who can't quite get on board with the Don, I have to admit that I get it. My lifes experience has culminated in an abject disdain for TV personality + fame. And that intuition hardly feels illogical.

Could he be a test? A trial of sorts? Sure. But if he is a sign for folks to get their chickens in order before show-time, he is a difficult test, and one that many rational, well intentioned, and good hearted people will fail.

The vaccine endorsement has me questioning his role, and perhaps the role of Q. I think skepticism and discernment are healthy, but they should lead any of us to steep skepticism of any character in play, from Lin Wood (who I deeply admire) to Donald Trump.

Thank you for this comment! Truly! It reminds me why this board is a unique and profound place.

Not just for the passages, but also for your commentary. A second look, and a second interpretation on the topic, is very much appreciated.

NOW, in response:

I think your take works out logically, I think your take works out theologically. However, it is a LOT to digest. And I don't mean that the biblical prophecy is hard to digest. Taken literally or figuratively, the Bible is a profound work of art.

What is difficult for me, as its always been, is Donald Trump. Even within the context of Q/TGA (the phenomenon, not this site), Donald Trump begs our scrutiny. I think that ANY person in the public narrative, and especially one who not only espouses his own sanctity but is adored by the masses, is worthy of the harshest critique. It seems he's a far cry from the demon-esq characterization hurled at him by his political adversaries, but he's still a business mogul who profited immensely off the most decadent stages of capitalism and the global subjugation of humanity. He's still a reality tv star who has clearly thrived off fame. His life and his education still sit firmly within reference to the mystery religions/illuminati/cabal (i.e. freemasonry, jesuits (georgetown), etc.).

Trump as frontman and bulletproof shield to the media for military masterminds I can take. But Trump as destroyer of evil? Trump as transcendental force for transcendental good? Perhaps. But it's hard not to sober up on him from time to time. Sure, the likelihood that opposing forces have existed for all time within the mystery religions/brotherhood of the snake/freemasons/jesuits is high I'd say. But in sympathy for those who can't quite get on board with the Don, I have to admit that I get it. My lifes experience has culminated in an abject disdain for TV personality + fame. And that intuition hardly feels illogical.

Could he be a test? A trial of sorts? Sure. But if he is a sign for folks to get their chickens in order before show-time, he is a difficult test, and one that many rational, well intentioned, and good hearted people will fail.

The vaccine endorsement has me questioning his role, and perhaps the role of Q. I think skepticism and discernment are healthy, but they should lead any of us to steep skepticism of any character in play, from Lin Wood (who I deeply admire) to Donald Trump.

Thank you for this comment! Truly! It reminds me why this board is a unique and profound place.

Not just for the passages, but also for your commentary. A second look, and a second interpretation on the topic, is very much appreciated.

NOW, in response:

I think your take works out logically, I think your take works out theologically. However, it is a LOT to digest. And I don't mean that the biblical prophecy is hard to digest. Taken literally or figuratively, the Bible is a profound work of art.

What is difficult for me, as its always been, is Donald Trump. Even within the context of Q/TGA (the phenomenon, not this site), Donald Trump begs our scrutiny. I think that ANY person in the public narrative, and especially one who not only espouses his own sanctity but is adored by the masses, is worthy of the harshest critique. It seems he's a far cry from the demon-esq characterization hurled at him by his political adversaries, but he's still a business mogul who profited immensely off the most decadent stages of capitalism and the global subjugation of humanity. He's still a reality tv star who has clearly thrived off fame. His life and his education still sit firmly within reference to the mystery religions/illuminati/cabal (i.e. freemasonry, jesuits (georgetown), etc.).

Trump as frontman and bulletproof shield to the media for military masterminds I can take. But Trump as destroyer of evil? Trump as transcendental force for transcendental good? Perhaps. But it's hard not to sober up on him from time to time. Sure, the likelihood that opposing forces have existed for all time within the mystery religions/brotherhood of the snake/freemasons/jesuits is high I'd say. But in sympathy for those who can't quite get on board with the Don, I have to admit that I get it. My lifes experience has culminated in an abject disdain for TV personality + fame. And that intuition hardly feels illogical.

Could he be a test? A trial of sorts? Sure. But if he is a sign for folks to get their chickens in order before show-time, he is a difficult test, and one that many rational people will fail.

The vaccine endorsement has me questioning his role, and perhaps the role of Q. I think skepticism and discernment are healthy, but they should lead any of us to steep skepticism of any character in play, from Lin Wood (who I deeply admire) to Donald Trump.