Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Evsrpa went down a bad dig, came out of it hot and made bad assumptions which triggered a sizable percentage of the community to go full hive mind accepting information as fact and belittling dissenters.

He went into the conversation with George News asking why they stole content from a publicly available free stock resource multiple times and got banned.. Then came back here and used being banned as proof that they stole content (its a free stock resource). Then sent a ton of people to repeat the same exact thing and used them being banned as more proof. The rest of the proof threads articulated how marketing websites work and made connections that weren't relevant and used that as more proof. Basically they think because GN uses a web service which is owned by a parent company that focuses on analytics which is also used by WEF is proof that GN is nefarious. I hope you can see the flawed logic in that.

Evspra defended all of it without question and banned/ridiculed anyone who said otherwise.

I’ve followed you here from /r/conspiracy. I’m on the train with everything you’ve ever posted. Evspra misunderstood what he found and then everything spiraled.

Doesn’t matter how polite or how much I articulate what happened. Go through some of my comments and discern from the responses.

3 years ago
-1 score
Reason: None provided.

Evsrpa went down a bad dig, came out of it hot and made bad assumptions which triggered a sizable percentage of the community to go full hive mind accepting information as fact and belittling dissenters.

He went into the conversation with George News asking why they stole content from a publicly available free stock resource multiple times and got banned.. Then came back here and used being banned as proof that they stole content (its a free stock resource). Then sent a ton of people to repeat the same exact thing and used them being banned as more proof. The rest of the proof threads articulated how marketing websites work and made connections that weren't relevant and used that as more proof. Basically they think because GN uses a web service which is owned by a parent company that focuses on analytics which is also used by WEF is proof that GN is nefarious. I hope you can see the flawed logic in that.

Evspra defended all of it without question and banned/ridiculed anyone who said otherwise.

I’ve followed you here from /r/conspiracy. I’m on the train with everything you’ve ever posted. Evspra misunderstood what he found and then everything spiraled.

Doesn’t matter how polite or how much I articulate what happened. Go through some of my comments and discern from the responses.

3 years ago
-1 score
Reason: None provided.

Evsrpa went down a bad dig, came out of it hot and made bad assumptions which triggered a sizable percentage of the community to go full hive mind accepting information as fact and belittling dissenters.

He went into the conversation with George News asking why they stole content from a publicly available free stock resource multiple times and got banned.. Then came back here and used being banned as proof that they stole content (its a free stock resource). Then sent a ton of people to repeat the same exact thing and used them being banned as more proof. The rest of the proof threads articulated how marketing websites work and made connections that weren't relevant and used that as more proof. Basically they think because GN uses a web service which is owned by a parent company that focuses on analytics which is also used by WEF is proof that GN is nefarious. I hope you can see the flawed logic in that.

Evspra defended all of it without question and banned/ridiculed anyone who said otherwise.

I’ve followed you here from /r/conspiracy. I’m on the train with everything you’ve ever posted. Evspra misunderstood what he found and then everything spiraled.

Seriously.. watch me get downvoted and berated. Doesn’t matter how polite or how much I articulate what happened.

3 years ago
-2 score
Reason: None provided.

Evsrpa went down a bad dig, came out of it hot and made bad assumptions which triggered a sizable percentage of the community to go full hive mind accepting information as fact and belittling dissenters.

He went into the conversation with George News asking why they stole content from a publicly available free stock resource multiple times and got banned.. Then came back here and used being banned as proof that they stole content (its a free stock resource). Then sent a ton of people to repeat the same exact thing and used them being banned as more proof. The rest of the proof threads articulated how marketing websites work and made connections that weren't relevant and used that as more proof. Basically they think because GN uses a web service which is owned by a parent company that focuses on analytics which is also used by WEF is proof that GN is nefarious. I hope you can see the flawed logic in that.

Evspra defended all of it without question and banned/ridiculed anyone who said otherwise.

I’ve followed you here from /r/conspiracy. I’m on the train with everything you’ve ever posted. Evspra misunderstood what he found and then everything spiraled.

3 years ago
-2 score
Reason: None provided.

Evsrpa went down a bad dig, came out of it hot and made bad assumptions which triggered a sizable percentage of the community to go full hive mind accepting information as fact and belittling dissenters.

He went into the conversation with George News asking why they stole content from a publicly available free stock resource multiple times and got banned.. Then came back here and used being banned as proof that they stole content (its a free stock resource). Then sent a ton of people to repeat the same exact thing and used them being banned as more proof. The rest of the proof threads articulated how marketing websites work and made connections that weren't relevant and used that as more proof. Basically they think because GN uses a web service which is owned by a parent company that focuses on analytics which is also used by WEF is proof that GN is nefarious. I hope you can see the flawed logic in that.

Evspra defended all of it without question and banned/ridiculed anyone who said otherwise.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Evsrpa went down a bad dig, came out of it hot and made bad assumptions which triggered a sizable percentage of the community to go full hive mind accepting information as fact and belittling dissenters.

He went into the conversation with George News asking why they stole content from a publicly available free stock resource multiple times and got banned.. Then came back here and used being banned as proof that they stole content (its a free stock resource). Then sent a ton of people to repeat the same exact thing and used them being banned as more proof. The rest of the proof threads articulated how marketing websites work and made connections that weren't relevant and used that as more proof. Basically they think because GN uses a web service which is owned by a parent company that focuses on analytics which is also used by WEF which is proof that GN is nefarious. I hope you can see the flawed logic in that.

Evspra defended all of it without question and banned/ridiculed anyone who said otherwise.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Evsrpa went down a bad dig, came out of it hot and made bad assumptions which triggered a sizable percentage of the community to go full hive mind accepting information as fact and belittling dissenters.

He went into the conversation with George News asking why they stole content from a publicly available free stock resource multiple times and got banned.. Then came back here and used being banned as proof that they stole content (its a free stock resource). Then sent a ton of people to repeat the same exact thing and used them being banned as more proof. The rest of the proof threads articulated how marketing websites work and made connections that weren't relevant and used that as more proof. Evspra defended all of it without question and banned/ridiculed anyone who said otherwise.

3 years ago
1 score