Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

mRNA jab is like becoming the virus to defeat a virus.

If and how to reverse it, as far as we know now, is unknown. It is still under investigation how it works exactly, and what it does exactly.

To maintain it can NEVER be reversed would be discounting human ingenuity.

Going with the basic idea of an mRNA level interference, it would suggest an anti mRNA neutralizing that particular mRNA strain. Of course this is just a potential avenue in need of further investigation.

I'm not arguing in favor of the jab and to become a patented human being, and potentially, your offspring for 30 generations too, if offspring generation is at all possible.

I am arguing to be conscious about our current lack of understanding and what we might be able to know in 30 or 50 years. Too late, I know. It would be an argument against taking the jab.

An addition to the topic:

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/scientists-propose-lunar-ark-store-67-million-sperm-samples-global-insurance-policy

And China trying to get the global vaccine passport business in it's grip.

Can you plot where this is leading?

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

mRNA jab is like becoming the virus to defeat a virus.

If and how to reverse it, as far as we know now, is unknown. It is still under investigation how it works exactly, and what it does exactly.

To maintain it can NEVER be reversed would be discounting human ingenuity.

Going with the basic idea of an mRNA level interference, it would suggest an anti mRNA neutralizing that particular mRNA strain. Of course this is just a potential avenue in need of further investigation.

I'm not arguing in favor of the jab and to become a patented human being, and potentially, your offspring for 30 generations too, if offspring generation is at all possible.

I am arguing to be conscious about our current lack of understanding and what we might be able to know in 30 or 50 years. Too late, I know. It would be an argument against taking the jab.

3 years ago
1 score