I suppose I made that my focus because I’m curious what lies ahead for us. There is no equality in which the constitution is an irrelevant piece of paper just because people work for me.

It seems highly likely “rules for thee, but not for me” was spoken with these business empires in mind. Private businesses are still public influencers. They have too much power!

Are we run by “We the People” or “We the Big Businesses”?

And if businesses count as a collection of people, the constitution, if it were perfect, should apply. Completely. Not just the beneficial parts.

I’d like to hear some drawbacks to that - potential repercussions. Chain reactions? I’m just a person. I don’t know everything. Someone let me hear them.

I suppose I made that my focus because I’m curious what lies ahead for us. There is no equality in which the constitution is an irrelevant piece of paper just because people work for me.

It seems highly likely “rules for thee, but not for me” was spoken with these business empires in mind. Private businesses are still public influencers. They have too much power!

Are we run by “We the People” or “We the Big Businesses”?

And if businesses count as a collection of people, the constitution, if it were perfect, should apply.

I’d like to hear some drawbacks to that - potential repercussions. Chain reactions? I’m just a person. I don’t know everything. Someone let me hear them.

I suppose I made that my focus because I’m curious what lies ahead for us. There is no equality in which the constitution is an irrelevant piece of paper just because people work for me.

It seems highly likely “rules for thee, and not for me” was spoken with these business empires in mind. Private businesses are still public influencers. They have too much power!

Are we run by “We the People” or “We the Big Businesses”?

And if businesses count as a collection of people, the constitution, if it were perfect, should apply.

I’d like to hear some drawbacks to that - potential repercussions. Chain reactions? I’m just a person. I don’t know everything. Someone let me hear them.

I suppose I made that my focus because I’m curious what lies ahead for us. There is no equality in which the constitution is an irrelevant piece of paper just because people work for me.

It seems highly likely “rules for thee, and not for me” was spoken with these business empires in mind. Private businesses are still public influencers. They have too much power!

Are we run by “We the People” or “We the Big Businesses”?

And if businesses count as a collection of people, the constitution, if it were perfect, should apply.

I’d like to hear some drawbacks to that - potential repercussions. I’m just a person. I don’t know everything. Someone let me hear them.

I suppose I made that my focus because I’m curious what lies ahead for us. There is no equality in which the constitution is an irrelevant piece of paper just because people work for me.

It seems highly likely “rules for thee, and not for me” was spoken with these business empires in mind. Private businesses are still public influencers. They have too much power!

Are we run by “We the People” or “We the Big Businesses”?

And if businesses count as a collection of people, the constitution, if it were perfect, should apply.

I’d like to hear some drawbacks to that - potential repercussions. I’m just a person. I don’t know everything. Let me hear them.

I suppose I made that my focus because I’m curious what lies ahead for us. There is no equality in which the constitution is an irrelevant piece of paper just because people work for me.

It seems highly likely “rules for thee, and not for me” was spoken with these business empires in mind. Private businesses are still public influencers. They have too much power!

Are we run by “We the People” or “We the Big Businesses”?

And if businesses count as a collection of people, the constitution, if it were perfect, should apply.

I suppose I made that my focus because I’m curious what lies ahead for us. There is no equality in which the constitution is an irrelevant piece of paper just because people work for me.

It seems highly likely “rules for thee, and not for me” was spoken with these business empires in mind. Private businesses are still public influencers. They have too much power!

Are we run by “We the People” or “We the Big Businesses”?