Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Damn, I went into that with an open mind, not having been a huge follower of this “sealed indictments” theory. And your link turned out to be one of the most laughably unconvincing deboonkings I’ve seen in a long time. Essentially what we “learn” is:

  • Those “Qanons” be cray-cray!
  • A lot of these are actually “surveillance and wiretap requests” (ok... sounds good to me ?)
  • The sealed indictment theory is super crazy... but Robert Mueller currently has a bunch of them ready to go for his impending takedown of Trump and family and associates ?
  • “63,000 sealed indictments”, “63,000 sealed indictments”. “63,000 sealed indictments” (Ok, if that number, granting many might indeed be wiretap and surveillance requests, seemed unexceptional to the author, how about 234,420 now??)

Again, I’m not sold on this “sealed indictment” theory. But nobody should see that link from whoever “Matt Rotchild” is, claiming to be a debunk of the “sealed indictments” theory, and think it’s anything but junk. It’s total junk.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Damn, I went into that with an open mind, not having been a huge follower of this “sealed indictments” theory. And your link turned out to be one of the most laughably unconvincing deboonkings I’ve seen in a long time. Essentially what we “learn” is:

  • Those “Qanons” be cray-cray!
  • A lot of these are actually “surveillance and wiretap requests” (ok... sounds good to me ?)
  • The sealed indictment theory is super crazy... but Robert Mueller currently has a bunch of them ready to go for his impending takedown of Trump and family and associates ?
  • “63,000 sealed indictments”, “63,000 sealed indictments”. “63,000 sealed indictments” (Ok, if that number, granting many might indeed be wiretap and surveillance requests, seemed unexceptional to the author, how about 234,420 now??)

Again, I’m not sold on this “sealed indictment” theory, and I’d very much like a sauce for those numbers (234,420) in the graphic before giving any of this credence. But nobody should see that link from whoever “Matt Rotchild” is, claiming to be a debunk of the “sealed indictments” theory, and think it’s anything but junk. It’s total junk.

3 years ago
1 score