Right... so the point I was getting at with Love, is that for now the point he/she is making is perhaps weakened by the proposed solution given that he/she is talking to loads of people that do not trust the government at this particular point in time. I was arguing the efficacy of the point they are making saying it would probably go over better without the second half of it attached. That is all. They said they didn't want to give up that part of the position because they feel strongly about it, in a fixed system, to which I said ok. So in terms of winning I simply pointed out that IMO "Funding an abortion is no different than hiring a hitman" was the winning point and proposing the solution was just detracting from that statement because you will lose people at that point. Not all people, just people.

Ok so next question... serial murderers are different than regular murderers in that the sheer number of victims provides in most cases, enough evidence, correlations, and sometimes even confessions so that we are(were?) reasonably sure we have the right criminal. However the depth of corruption that I think I am seeing right now has me questioning everything, I have to admit it's getting real weird. Also just read your comment about me getting twisted, yeah a bit, but the Lord will probably come through with some clarity soon. Have a good day Light nice chatting with you as always.

Right... so the point I was getting at with Love, is that for now the point he/she is making is perhaps weakened by the proposed solution given that he/she is talking to loads of people that do not trust the government at this particular point in time. I was arguing the efficacy of the point they are making saying it would probably go over better without the second half of it attached. That is all. They said they didn't want to give up that part of the position because they feel strongly about it, in a fixed system, to which I said ok. So in terms of winning I simply pointed out that IMO "Funding an abortion is no different than hiring a hitman" was the winning point and proposing the solution was just detracting from that statement because you will lose people at that point. Not all people, just people.

Ok so next question... serial murderers are different than regular murderers in that the sheer number of victims provides in most cases, enough evidence, correlations, and sometimes even confessions so that we are(were?) reasonably sure we have the right criminal. However the depth of corruption that I think I am seeing right now has me questioning everything, I have to admit it's getting real weird.