Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The MSM and CDC are hiding the truth about the vaccines.

I agree completely. We are in a disinformation war for the planet. The "trusted sources" are anything but. That is why I am constantly trying to help clear up confusions and baseless fears about something I know a great deal about.

If these vaccines are what they say they are (no hidden ingredients) everything I have said above is accurate. Both the technologies and the biology are very complicated. To the point that people like Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Carrie Madej, some of the America's Frontline Doctors, etc. make numerous mistakes in both the biology and/or the technology.

For example: Dr. Carrie Madej, at about 4:30 in her video talks about how the "lipid nanocarrier" is a "hydrogel". This is completely false. I have made both of these things. They are completely different. They aren't made using the same processes. They aren't made of the same materials. They don't even work on the same scale (micro v. nano). She was doing fine up until then on the biology, but once she started talking about the technology itself she made mistakes. Dr. Tenpenny got quite a few things wrong. Not everything, but more than enough to cause a ton of disinformation. I don't think it was intentional, but doctors do not know cell and molecular biology as well as scientists and researchers in the field. They don't know it well enough because to be an M.D. they don't have to. (I have worked with many M.D.s.)

That doesn't mean all doctors are ignorant on these topics, but in my experience, unless the doctor specializes in a field that requires that knowledge (oncologist e.g.) or they are a researcher themselves (M.D. Ph.D.) they never spend the time to learn it well (it takes a LOT of time, it is a very complicated subject).

Among those doctors that do have sufficient knowledge of cell biology, most are clueless about bio-nanotechnology. So even if they get the biology right, they make mistakes on the technology, and then are unable to make the correct conclusions because they don't understand what the technology can or can't do.

I am a researcher in cell biology and bio-nanotechnology. This gives me the unique perspective of being an expert (relatively speaking) on every topic related to the vaccines. This background, along with a thousand or so hours of research into the vaccines themselves allows me to be critical of everyone else speaking on these topics. Most make mistakes, though not all. I am trying to inform those less capable of weeding through the disinformation of what is really going on, or more precisely (because I don't know what is really going on) what is NOT going on with the vaccines and/or what is disinformation and what is credible.

RE: the evil agenda of our Luciferian Overlords:

Is it possible that the vaccine companies are lying about what's in them? Yes, but it is very unlikely for the following reasons:

  1. In a thousand hours of looking, I have found zero credible evidence (ZERO) that they have put in alternate ingredients. The importance of this can't be understated.
  2. They want to test the technology as advertised. It's actually pretty cool tech, with potential applications. The problem is, its originally a cancer tech. In order to get large scale testing there aren't enough cancer patients (of the type this tech could be used on). They need another application, like an emergency vaccine.
  3. They would be found out (eventually) if they put in other ingredients than what is listed. They are currently completely free from responsibility with regards to this tech. But if they put something in that wasn't listed, they could be sued for all they're worth. They would lose everything.
  4. I think this was a trial run. There is no reason to go full blast out the gate. On the contrary, getting people used to the idea of constant vaccines is the perfect way to slowly kill off or sterilize the population without an uprising. They have been working on a plan of total world domination and their utopia for hundreds to thousands of years in one form or another. They are more patient and long term thinking than is imaginable. They would be patient with this too.

I do not think the PTB have any moral qualms about depopulation through a vaccine. I think it is likely that that is a primary goal. But after looking extensively, I don't think that will be a major outcome with this. By that I mean, there are people that are dying. There will likely be more. There may even be quite a few more, but it won't be a depopulation level event from this vaccine.

There may be an effect on sterility. This is an unknown and needs to be looked in to. But even if true, I have seen no evidence to suggest it will be a large effect. I've looked at the similarity of the SARS-cov-2 spike protein and Syncytin-1 and they are not similar enough to be likely to cause such a problem in many people, if any at all. I.e. if there is any effect at all (an unknown) is very unlikely to be a strong enough to substantially reduce the population going forward, even if it theoretically might be enough to vex a few individuals.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The MSM and CDC are hiding the truth about the vaccines.

I agree completely. We are in a disinformation war for the planet. The "trusted sources" are anything but. That is why I am constantly trying to help clear up confusions and baseless fears about something I know a great deal about.

If these vaccines are what they say they are (no hidden ingredients) everything I have said above is accurate. Both the technologies and the biology are very complicated. To the point that people like Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Carrie Madej, some of the America's Frontline Doctors, etc. make numerous mistakes in both the biology and/or the technology.

For example: Dr. Carrie Madej, at about 4:30 in her video talks about how the "lipid nanocarrier" is a "hydrogel". This is completely false. I have made both of these things. They are completely different. They aren't made using the same processes. They aren't made of the same materials. They don't even work on the same scale (micro v. nano). She was doing find up until then on the biology, but once she started talking about the technology itself she made mistakes. Dr. Tenpenny got quite a few things wrong. Not everything, but more than enough to cause a ton of disinformation. I don't think it was intentional, but doctors do not know cell and molecular biology as well as scientists and researchers in the field. They don't know it well enough because to be an M.D. they don't have to. (I have worked with many M.D.s.)

That doesn't mean all doctors are ignorant on these topics, but in my experience, unless the doctor specializes in a field that requires that knowledge (oncologist e.g.) or they are a researcher themselves (M.D. Ph.D.) they never spend the time to learn it well (it takes a LOT of time, it is a very complicated subject).

Among those doctors that do have sufficient knowledge of cell biology, most are clueless about bio-nanotechnology. So even if they get the biology right, they make mistakes on the technology, and then are unable to make the correct conclusions because they don't understand what the technology can or can't do.

I am a researcher in cell biology and bio-nanotechnology. This gives me the unique perspective of being an expert (relatively speaking) on every topic related to the vaccines. This background, along with a thousand or so hours of research into the vaccines themselves allows me to be critical of everyone else speaking on these topics. Most make mistakes, though not all. I am trying to inform those less capable of weeding through the disinformation of what is really going on, or more precisely (because I don't know what is really going on) what is NOT going on with the vaccines and/or what is disinformation and what is credible.

RE: the evil agenda of our Luciferian Overlords:

Is it possible that the vaccine companies are lying about what's in them? Yes, but it is very unlikely for the following reasons:

  1. In a thousand hours of looking, I have found zero credible evidence (ZERO) that they have put in alternate ingredients. The importance of this can't be understated.
  2. They want to test the technology as advertised. It's actually pretty cool tech, with potential applications. The problem is, its originally a cancer tech. In order to get large scale testing there aren't enough cancer patients (of the type this tech could be used on). They need another application, like an emergency vaccine.
  3. They would be found out (eventually) if they put in other ingredients than what is listed. They are currently completely free from responsibility with regards to this tech. But if they put something in that wasn't listed, they could be sued for all their worth. They would lose everything.
  4. I think this was a trial run. There is no reason to go full blast out the gate. On the contrary, getting people used to the idea of constant vaccines is the perfect way to slowly kill off or sterilize the population without an uprising. They have been working on a plan of total world domination and their utopia for hundreds to thousands of years in one form or another. They are more patient and long term thinking than is imaginable. They would be patient with this too.

I do not think the PTB have any moral qualms about depopulation through a vaccine. I think it is likely that that is a primary goal. But after looking extensively, I don't think that will be a major outcome with this. By that I mean, there are people that are dying. There will likely be more. There may even be quite a few more, but it won't be a depopulation level event from this vaccine.

There may be an effect on sterility. This is an unknown and needs to be looked in to. But even if true, I have seen no evidence to suggest it will be a large effect. I've looked at the similarity of the SARS-cov-2 spike protein and Syncytin-1 and they are not similar enough to be likely to cause such a problem in many people, if any at all. I.e. if there is any effect at all (an unknown) is very unlikely to be a strong enough to substantially reduce the population going forward, even if it theoretically might be enough to vex a few individuals.

3 years ago
1 score